Quote Originally Posted by Albionic68 View Post
I can’t really see the problem myself. They’re not teaching the kids about gay *** or any other kind of ***. They’re trying to highlight an acceptance that we’re not all the same when kids are at an age to take things on board without the petty boorishness of early teenage years.

No one is telling the kids they should become gay or think about giving it a go. There are no ****ographic or illicit images in any of the literature either. Personally speaking I’m more offended by school playing fields being sold off for profits, thus denying kids access to sports facilities and the best start to life in terms of both physical and mental wellbeing.

This is not an attempt to promote homo***uality, it’s an attempt to sow the seeds of thought and produce more rounded individuals. There are far more important things to worry about in education than whether two cartoon character penguins should or shouldn’t be left to nurture an egg, or whether a cartoon character boy likes wearing dresses rather than trousers. Just a few thoughts.
Interesting view point! Perhaps there should be an opt out therefore where the parent decides what their child should or should not be subjected to at such a young age. We know that won’t work!

I would not be happy if my child at primary was told it’s OK to be gay or wear dresses. Same if they were taught by a man wearing a dress or a female with her face completely covered. If an individual though wants to do whatever they wish in private - I would have no objection. If a footballer is gay - could not care less if he was good at football! I do object though to all this hype about rainbow laces and various gay prides. Should loving relationships between man and woman not be promoted more equally!