Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
That's very unfair, John. I have never questioned the notion that any step towards military action or even economic sanctions should be evidence based and think it perfectly reasonable that Corbyn challenges, but his comment was not a question. He had clearly prejudged the issue, which is, of course, a symptom of prejudice.

He could have questioned the evidence upon which the government's position was based. That would have been simply done and entirely reasonable, but he didn't, which is why I criticise his position.
Is the only way you would accept Corbyn if he ended every sentence with a question mark? Are there not other ways to raise issues? Is a structure of a sentence really such a bad thing if the content is reasonable but it doesn't end with a full stop? Was it not self explanatory that a video of the removal of bombs doesn't conclusively prove the planting of them? Are you holding a prejudice towards Corbyn in this bizarre standard of 'not structuring tweets as questions' you appear to be holding him to?