+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 339 of 513 FirstFirst ... 239289329337338339340341349389439 ... LastLast
Results 3,381 to 3,390 of 5123

Thread: Rangers Then, Sevco Now, Scotland's Shame Forever....

  1. #3381
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    2,076
    Quote Originally Posted by 57vintage View Post
    I ****ing QUOTED it, numbnuts. There is no ‘back’. The ****ing filthy rancid rotten putrid decaying corrupt right wing edifice snuffed it. Liquidated. No more. Perished. Deid.
    You need to read it again manny 👍

  2. #3382
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    33,119
    Latest Hun statement is not going to go down well with their more 'traditional fans

    https://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/uefa-charge

  3. #3383
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    2,076
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    Latest Hun statement is not going to go down well with their more 'traditional fans

    https://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/uefa-charge
    Meh. Commendable or just playing it safe in case they qualify for but are then subsequently booted out of the group stages?

  4. #3384
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    7,645
    Quote Originally Posted by Devanha Red View Post
    Meh. Commendable or just playing it safe in case they qualify for but are then subsequently booted out of the group stages?
    If this second racist behaviour charge is proved, the Huns will play their next European home match at a closed Ibrox.

    They already reached stage 2 for tomorrow's game:
    2 If one or more of a member association or club’s supporters engage in the behaviour described in paragraph 1, the member association or club responsible is punished with a minimum of a partial stadium closure.

    Next stages are:
    3 The following disciplinary measures apply in the event of recidivism:
    a. a second offence is punished with one match played behind closed doors and a fine of € 50,000;
    b. any subsequent offence is punished with more than one match behind closed doors, a stadium closure, the forfeiting of a match, the deduction of points and/or disqualification from the competition.

  5. #3385
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    411
    I think they are pre-empting to try and get a softer punishment when it comes
    "Look we at are taking action don't ban us"
    After playing so many friendlies they are obviously skint so a closed door game would serious hit them hard in the pocket,

    Quote Originally Posted by Devanha Red View Post
    Meh. Commendable or just playing it safe in case they qualify for but are then subsequently booted out of the group stages?
    Doesn't matter if they qualify or not. If they qualify the punishment is the group game or the 1st game next season.

  6. #3386
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    17,112
    Quote Originally Posted by Devanha Red View Post
    You need to read it again manny 👍
    You need to re-write it ‘mannie’.

    Maybe the suspicions previously voiced have some substance.

    🔎🔎🔎🔎

  7. #3387
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    2,076
    Quote Originally Posted by 57vintage View Post
    You need to re-write it ‘mannie’.

    Maybe the suspicions previously voiced have some substance.

    🔎🔎🔎🔎
    I suggest you get somebody to read it back to you then. Maybe somebody with legal training or at least a fine eye for detail and contract reading experience or the likes.

    Once the penny drops I'll not be wanting an apology from you. Us old timers need to stick together 👍

  8. #3388
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,500
    Holy fυck min .... if ye knew 57 like I know 57 ( Oh ,,, Oh ,,,, Oh what a gal ) ... you would realise that casting doubt on his skills regarding comprehension, understanding, and interpretation of anything committed to text, is a foolish endeavour likely to result in you being unveiled as a complete tit .... except ... incomplete ... nae nipple ... nae redeemin feature .... jist a tit.

  9. #3389
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    3,629
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    Latest Hun statement is not going to go down well with their more 'traditional fans

    https://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/uefa-charge
    "By supporting Rangers in the correct way the rest of us must strive to protect our great Club. One way or another this offensive behaviour must end and it would be much more preferable if we stopped it ourselves, simply by behaving like true Rangers fans"

    Hahaha - that statements a beauty, especially the last line. Its because they are behaving like true huns that they're in trouble

    Dicks. You would hope that this action by UEFA has put to bed the complete fabrication by the SFA & SPFL that strict liability wouldnt work in Scotland.

    One instruction by UEFA to close off 3000 seats has caused more action by Sevco than they or their deid predecessor managed in over 100 years.

    Timing of that "everyone / anyone" initiative pish was also very convenient. Almost as if they knew a UEFA charge was coming down the pipe & had to be seen to be doing something. Couldn't be that though could it - must have been in the planning for years.

    Lets hope they are impeccably behaved tonight & then the party tunes are back on full display at full volume from minute one on Sunday - would put any argument for not introducing strict liability in Scotland to bed once and for all.

  10. #3390
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    2,076
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Moog View Post
    "By supporting Rangers in the correct way the rest of us must strive to protect our great Club. One way or another this offensive behaviour must end and it would be much more preferable if we stopped it ourselves, simply by behaving like true Rangers fans"

    Hahaha - that statements a beauty, especially the last line. Its because they are behaving like true huns that they're in trouble

    Dicks. You would hope that this action by UEFA has put to bed the complete fabrication by the SFA & SPFL that strict liability wouldnt work in Scotland.

    One instruction by UEFA to close off 3000 seats has caused more action by Sevco than they or their deid predecessor managed in over 100 years.

    Timing of that "everyone / anyone" initiative pish was also very convenient. Almost as if they knew a UEFA charge was coming down the pipe & had to be seen to be doing something. Couldn't be that though could it - must have been in the planning for years.

    Lets hope they are impeccably behaved tonight & then the party tunes are back on full display at full volume from minute one on Sunday - would put any argument for not introducing strict liability in Scotland to bed once and for all.
    It's a piece of piss to eradicate it if you really want to.

    It's censorship so I'd be against it but you could just give them a stadium ban every time their fans were heard to sing an 'offending' song. Wouldn't be very long before even the most staunch of Huns cut them out and those that didn't you can be sure the club would soon ban them.

    It's really not that hard to do. There just needs to be a genuine will to do it.

Page 339 of 513 FirstFirst ... 239289329337338339340341349389439 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •