Originally Posted by
Exiletyke
Thankyou for clearing that up but just for the record I genuinely could not understand your point but nevertheless
what a shockingly poor argument
Let me rephrase with something nearer the truth
First of all it was not a questionnaire it was a referendum but your argument hinges around it being advisory
If when filling out this rdiculous questionnaire your solicitor [substitute prime minister here] told you that your decision [answer] would be binding & then proceeds to send you a letter [ telling you that you should buy the house] & he would take your instruction from. there then over 450 advisors told you the same [triggering article 50]
Then you could be forgiven for thinking that the vote was something more than a "questionnaire"
Hall Of Fame
Reply With Quote