Political Thread in memory of David Reid. (R.I.P.)

[The Bedlington Terrier]

800,000 people butchered & killed by machetes in Rwanda and these despicable ratbags are trying to make some sort of political gain from it.

Sunak even manages to crawl lower than a snake's belly.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

A dog is carrying the body of an innocent Gazan child from the IDF air force blasted rubble.

Are we still living under the assumption that by performing prayers, fasting, Hajj and Umrah, that The Israelis will be brought to justice and Muslims will deserve heaven????

Attachment 26023

[sinkov]

"The objectionable behaviour of some aid agencies, moreover, thickens the fog and makes mistakes and therefore civilian casualties more likely. Look at the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA).The UK and US, among others, have suspended funding after 13 of the agency’s employees were found to have participated in the October 7 terrorist attacks. Nine have been sacked.

Many UNRWA employees are indistinguishable from Hamas terrorists. Sara A-Dirawi, an UNRWA teacher in Gaza, celebrated the rapes, murders and mutilations on social media. Suhail al-Hindi, the headmaster of an UNRWA-run school and chairman of the UNRWA Gaza Workers’ Union, was elected to the Hamas politburo in 2017. The Hamas minister responsible for the economy, Jawad Abu Shamala, worked as a teacher in an UNRWA school in Khan Younis.

A former long-serving UNRWA staffer lamented that finding neutral employees is very difficult. Well, clearly. UNRWA’s collusion with Hamas adds another layer of complexity to the conflict in Gaza. How can Israel trust UN aid convoys when they know that they could be working for Hamas? And when one considers what Janice Davis refers to in TCW as the ‘quasi-militarisation’ of aid agencies – armed security personnel making agency workers more vulnerable to friendly fire – one instantly realises the difficulties faced by Israeli operatives trying to distinguish friend from foe.

The UN is indeed deeply hostile to the only democracy in the Middle East. After October 7, the UN’s women’s rights body took nearly two months to condemn Hamas’s use of ***ual violence. The UN Security Council is yet to condemn the atrocities. To add insult to injury, a Hamas intelligence centre was found beneath a UN headquarters in Gaza City. It’s worth repeating: how can the Israelis trust UN aid convoys when they know that the organisation is deeply antithetical to the Israeli state and, as a result, could be colluding with Hamas?

The same dilemma is caused by the Red Cross’s anti-Israel stance. The Palestinian Red Cross Society (affiliated to the International Committee of the Red Cross) is widely known to have transported Hamas terrorists in its ambulances. Many Israelis, including Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, founder of Shurat HaDin-Israel Law Centre, scold the Red Cross not only for this, but also for not doing enough to help the Jewish hostages still being held in Gaza, many of whom now look to have been killed.In a letter signed by 1,200 solicitors, Darshan-Leitner said that it’s a ‘decades-old pattern with the Red Cross’, before highlighting their failure to assist Jews in the Nazi concentration camps during the Second World War.

Amnesty International has revealed its deranged partiality when it comes to the conflict. In a tweet, it described the recent death in an Israeli prison of a convicted Palestinian torturer and murderer as ‘a cruel reminder of Israel’s disregard for Palestinians’ right to life’. The man tortured and castrated his 19-year-old victim.

It appears that many aid agencies and human rights organisations have imbibed Israelophobic narratives rooted in identity politics, anti-Semitism and the dissemination of misinformation and disinformation. They have renounced impartiality and ceased to be neutral dispensers of aid. In some cases they have become active Hamas terrorists wearing agency insignia. This adds a terrifying level of complexity to Israel’s mission to destroy Hamas and minimise civilian suffering."

[sinkov]

"OBLIVIOUS to the threat Israel is under, no longer just from terrorist Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) combat troops in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Palestinian terrorist forces in the West Bank, but also now direct ballistic attack from Iran, the pearl-clutching commentariat and our cowardly elites insist that Israel is not doing enough to avoid civilian casualties in Gaza. Apparently more than 30,000 civilians are dead, the majority of whom are women and children. To some, these distressing figures, fabricated by Hamas and enthusiastically announced by their cheerleaders in the Western media, most notably the BBC, are evidence of a genocidal assault by the Israeli military and, by extension, the Jewish people. The immanent bloodlust of the Jews is well documented, didn’t you know?

Hamas’s genocidal attack on the citizens of Israel on October 7 is presumably beside the point. Jews are there to be slaughtered. The fact that Hamas hides within the Gazan population, using them as human shields and thereby maximising the number of civilian deaths, is also beside the point. Jews aren’t allowed to fight back. That’s against the rules.

Okay, I know the first casualty of every war is the truth but this is a mockery. It’s back to front, upside down and lost in a labyrinthine web of deceit covered in a thick fog of disinformation disseminated by ‘fact-checkers’ in the offices of our broadcast media.

Israel is doing all it can to avoid civilian casualties. According to John Spencer, one of the world’s foremost authorities in urban warfare, Israel’s civilian-to-combatant casualty ratio in Gaza is lower than in any comparable conflict. Indeed, it is 1 combatant to 1.5 civilians, compared with a global average of 1 combatant to 9 civilians. (In Mosul, Iraq, in 2016-17, when US and UK forces destroyed ISIS, it was 1:2.5.) Spencer says that Israel protects civilians more effectively than anyone else in the history of warfare. It is the only nation that, through phone calls, text messages and voicemails, warns civilians of any planned assault in an effort save life, even though such forewarnings give Hamas a military advantage.

Yet facts don’t seem to matter. Even though three distinguished academics recently debunked Hamas’s casualty figures, pointing out in particular that those concerning women and children are ‘statistically impossible’, the UN, BBC and MSM continue to libel the Jewish state with bogus numbers that incite hatred against not only Israel but the Jewish people.

What about the deaths of seven World Central Kitchen aid workers last week? Surely this is proof of Israel’s deliberate targeting of not only civilians, but those selfless enough to help them? No, it’s not. It’s proof that war is hell. Innocent people die and mistakes happen. And this was a mistake, a bad one, for which two senior officers were dismissed.

Such instances are not unique to the current conflict. Despite Lord Cameron’s nauseating expositions of north London dinner-party groupthink, he was responsible for the accidental deaths of large numbers of civilians during his 2011 Libyan misadventure. Obama’s drone strike that hit a wedding party in Afghanistan, killing 47 innocents, also springs to mind – exposing Biden, the then Vice-President who now, as President, berates what he inaccurately and outrageously calls Israel’s indiscriminate bombing, to charges of hypocrisy. The evidence is clear: Israel does not deliberately target civilians. In fact, it goes above and beyond to avoid civilian casualties. But the fog of war leads to mistakes, and such mistakes are rightly investigated and punished, as they have been in this case."

[The Bedlington Terrier]

It's no wonder anti-Semitism is on the rise is it mon ami?

You don't even need to lift a stone anymore to see if it crawls out, it's everywhere.

Attachment 26040

[The Bedlington Terrier]

You have to hand it to the Tories and their true blue supporters their diversionary tactics are a joy to behold.

[Balanbam00]

Does she know what she is talking about??

Since 2001, Palestinian militants have launched tens of thousands of rocket and mortar attacks on Israel from the Gaza Strip as part of the continuing Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The attacks, widely condemned for targeting civilians, have been described as terrorism by the United Nations, the European Union, and Israeli officials, and are defined as war crimes by human rights groups Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. The international community considers indiscriminate attacks on civilian targets to be illegal under international law. Palestinian militants say rocket attacks are a response to Israel's blockade of Gaza, but the Palestinian Authority has condemned them and says rocket attacks undermine peace.

[sinkov]

"Police under fire after threat to arrest ‘openly Jewish’ man near pro-Palestinian protest
Scotland Yard criticised after suggesting Gideon Falter’s presence was ‘provocative’ and he was ‘antagonising’ protesters"

It's not just the Labour Party, our Police are openly anti-semitic as well. Jews not welcome in the Labour party or on the streets of London.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

"Police under fire after threat to arrest ‘openly Jewish’ man near pro-Palestinian protest
Scotland Yard criticised after suggesting Gideon Falter’s presence was ‘provocative’ and he was ‘antagonising’ protesters"

It's not just the Labour Party, our Police are openly anti-semitic as well. Jews not welcome in the Labour party or on the streets of London.

If they carry on with this genocidal madness there will be no safe places for Jews anywhere mon ami.

What the Jews are doing in the West Bank is plunder and murder.

Enough is enough.

[sinkov]

Ireland for the Irish

"It is rare in politics for policies to have such an immediate effect that one can justifiably say: ‘See? Told you.’ But that is what has happened with the Rwanda stuff. Those who have argued that sending illegal asylum seekers to Rwanda is not a deterrent no longer have a leg to stand on. It is all the more piquant, of course, because the Irish have been clamouring for an open border with Northern Ireland since late June 2016 – so here it is, fill your boots.

Better still, the Irish courts recently decided that the UK is not a safe country to which asylum seekers might be dispatched, on the grounds that we will send them to Africa. So the Irish have been stitched up like a kipper by that most magnificent of things, reality.

In truth, they should be glad: all those migrants will now have a safe and welcoming place to live, rather than being subjected to the famous historic brutality of the Bruddish – that’s what you wanted, isn’t it? In all your rhetoric? Because the migrant crisis hardly impinged at all. It’s one thing bobbing about in a dinghy across 20 miles of the English Channel – the Irish Sea is a whole other caboodle.

If I were the British home secretary I think I’d open a new refugee-processing centre in somewhere like Crossmaglen, with very clear directions to the border, or possibly a shuttle bus. Suddenly, from the Republic, the virtue-signalling has fallen rather quiet and been replaced by xenophobia – towards us and the migrants. But then it is always difficult to grandstand if you are in a peat bog, metaphorically of course. You just sink under the weight of your own stupid hubris. This is an uppance which has been a long time coming and has provided the rest of us, over here, with copious amounts of craic."