Dear me, as Waallsend Mick would say

[ronandtet]

its still covered

"A much discussed topic is the IP address. The GDPR states that IP addresses should be considered personal data as it enters the scope of ‘online identifiers’. Of course, in the case of a dynamic IP address – which is changed every time a person connects to a network – there has been some legitimate debate going on as to whether it can truly lead to the identification of a person or not. The conclusion is that the GDPR does consider it as such. The logic behind this decision is relatively simple. The internet service provider (ISP) has a record of the temporary dynamic IP address and knows to whom it has been assigned. A website provider has a record of the web pages accessed by a dynamic IP address (but no other data that would lead to the identification of the person). If the two pieces information would be combined, the website provider could find the identity of the person behind a certain dynamic IP address. However, the chances of this happening are small, as the ISP has to meet certain legal obligations before it can hand the data to a website provider. The conclusion is, all IP addresses should be treated as personal data, in order to be GDPR compliant."

[pboromag]

Erm...an ip address is just a series of numbers...it doesn't give any personal info...😂

wrong

[Geordie1974]

A good VPN and IP addresses mean nothing.

[usedtobeshearer]

"A much discussed topic is the IP address. The GDPR states that IP addresses should be considered personal data as it enters the scope of ‘online identifiers’. Of course, in the case of a dynamic IP address – which is changed every time a person connects to a network – there has been some legitimate debate going on as to whether it can truly lead to the identification of a person or not. The conclusion is that the GDPR does consider it as such. The logic behind this decision is relatively simple. The internet service provider (ISP) has a record of the temporary dynamic IP address and knows to whom it has been assigned. A website provider has a record of the web pages accessed by a dynamic IP address (but no other data that would lead to the identification of the person). If the two pieces information would be combined, the website provider could find the identity of the person behind a certain dynamic IP address. However, the chances of this happening are small, as the ISP has to meet certain legal obligations before it can hand the data to a website provider. The conclusion is, all IP addresses should be treated as personal data, in order to be GDPR compliant."

Aye, I understand that and in no way would expect you to share...I was just being flippant with pboro..

[usedtobeshearer]

wrong

Sorry. .numbers and letters...

[ex_pat_magpie]

But Pboro you CLEARLY stated you had sent me and email. You do not have my email address. That was either a post or a P.M.

I repeat you could not have sent me an email, otherwise you would have my email address which you do not.

This fact that you just do not read posts correctly is a considerable part of the problems you cause. You are too hasty to accuse people of this and that, that you constantly leave yourself open to ridicule far, far too often by not digesting what posters have written.

I have actually seen more than once on here you having a go at posters who have actually agreed with you because in your haste or laziness in reading posts have concluded in error that they were arguing with you.

You couldn't make it up to be more comical if you tried.

[pboromag]

trouble is pat you have more faces than a town hall clock
i clearly supported you and you clearly appreciated the support
but just so two faced

[Milburn9]

trouble is pat you have more faces than a town hall clock
i clearly supported you and you clearly appreciated the support
but just so two faced

Someone needs a hug.

[ex_pat_magpie]

trouble is pat you have more faces than a town hall clock
i clearly supported you and you clearly appreciated the support
but just so two faced

Pboro just talking about the faces. Look in the mirror.

What I have continuously said. You claimed you sent me an EMAIL. I say you did not as you do not have my email address. Only a select few on here have my email address and you are certainly not among the select few.

Now I'd bet a pound to a grain of sand that you either misread this or purposely distort it but a bit of sound advice.

Quit while you are still behind.

[pboromag]

and if you also remember pat you got told of by the mods for bear baaiting and you cried like a baby when they had a go at you for consatantly starting threads saying how good the board was etc when i wasnt on etc

you dont change do you

you cried like a babay when i think jammy repremanded you and cried for ages
i think you sent me a pm about it saying lets stop for the sake of the board
and i told you its not me doing the wind ups and stiring and bear baiting


things dont change