One made us, one saved us....

[EastStandRed]

It was PC who insisted on maintaining a 20% share in the club presumably to excercise some influence which currently is patently lacking

It makes sense to keep it as an asset to pass to his family and keeps his son involved. Also ties in with them still owning half the ground

[Exiletyke]

It makes sense to keep it as an asset to pass to his family and keeps his son involved. Also ties in with them still owning half the ground

It makes sense for what purpose keeping his son involved?

[EastStandRed]

It makes sense for what purpose keeping his son involved?

Well if I was dying and owned my home town football club and I was selling it and my wife and son followed them home and away and my son wanted to stay involved in some capacity and there was a chance to keep a minority shareholding for my family in the sale I’d do the same

[Exiletyke]

Well if I was dying and owned my home town football club and I was selling it and my wife and son followed them home and away and my son wanted to stay involved in some capacity and there was a chance to keep a minority shareholding for my family in the sale I’d do the same

No mention there of the best interests of the club which hopefully will still be there when all parties have moved on

[EastStandRed]

No mention there of the best interests of the club which hopefully will still be there when all parties have moved on

Keeping hold of a 50% share of the land and stadium with the council was supposed to keep things secure for the short term