Quote Originally Posted by StensonRam View Post
I get you point a little bit but wouldn't the have FA signed off on the cost of naming the ground yet now say its disproportionate, very similar to the EFL saying our ground isn't worth 80m yet signed it off
No its different because MCFC claimed that the sponsorship of the ground was entirely by Etihad, but it now transpires that only around £10 million was, the rest is allegedly paid by the clubs owner. So its an attempt to cover up reality rather than a interpretation of the rules.