"I'm not surprised you weren't keen to respond, a bit too close to the truth, especially the policy of invalidating the votes of 17.4 million people, straight out of the fascist playbook that one."

That's rubbish and you must know it is.
Surely you realise that a party of true conviction will hold it's beliefs even when it is defeated. It won't suddenly say, "Having thought about it, you were right all along".
But, to be fair, you may have a point if we didn't have a democracy.
Without winning over sufficient voters then it doesn't matter in our system.
We tried like fury to win the argument, and we were definitely getting there steadily, but Jo made two fatal errors.
First, the revoke thing. It was unnecessary and not very well explained.
Second, when she said "I am standing here as a candidate to be your next PM". This was, of course, true, but it came across as arrogant.
A bit like "Go back to your constituencies and prepare for Government"
Normally, in an election campaign, the Lib Dems pick up support.
In this one we went from around 25% down to 11.5%.
I wonder what Jo is thinking today?

By the way, I didn't expect the argument to be a re-hash of Brexit. Plenty of time to argue about that once we see what kind of deals we get from the EU, USA and China.

I'll try to think of summat....