+ Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: football clubs on furlough

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    12,744
    The players will be asked to consider a 30% reduction in wages while the crisis goes on.

    Not enough in my opinion. Doctors and nurses are putting their lives on the line every day while these people are doing nowt.
    They also get paid an absolute pittance in comparison to footballers.
    Which lot would we miss most if they disappeared?
    Will they even agree to losing 30% of their wage?
    We should remember this when they are finally playing again and expecting us to part with our £30's or subscribe to Sky/BT to fund their ridiculous lifestyles.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52148955

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    24,197
    Quote Originally Posted by 1959_60 View Post
    The players will be asked to consider a 30% reduction in wages while the crisis goes on.

    Not enough in my opinion. Doctors and nurses are putting their lives on the line every day while these people are doing nowt.
    They also get paid an absolute pittance in comparison to footballers.
    Which lot would we miss most if they disappeared?
    Will they even agree to losing 30% of their wage?
    We should remember this when they are finally playing again and expecting us to part with our £30's or subscribe to Sky/BT to fund their ridiculous lifestyles.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52148955
    It's a complete and utter distraction and irrelevance, they can take any pay cut they like or none at all, it makes no difference to anything. How can 30% be 'not enough' 59, what is enough, 50%, 75%, stop their wages all together ? FFS, we're in the midst of the biggest crisis since WW2 and this is what the media think the nation should be discussing, whether footballers should take a pay cut. I knew they should never have abolished Grammar Schools, this level of debate is the result.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    It's a complete and utter distraction and irrelevance, they can take any pay cut they like or none at all, it makes no difference to anything. How can 30% be 'not enough' 59, what is enough, 50%, 75%, stop their wages all together ? FFS, we're in the midst of the biggest crisis since WW2 and this is what the media think the nation should be discussing, whether footballers should take a pay cut. I knew they should never have abolished Grammar Schools, this level of debate is the result.
    Just wait another day or two sinkov and the blame for this coronavirus malarkey will fall square and fair on the shoulders of Raheem Sterling.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •