Quote Originally Posted by RED_JOHN View Post
We would definitely have a better chance of winning a league if we only had to play Celtic twice in a league campaign.
I wouldn't mind a reduction in the number of times we play the bigot brothers. But the reality is we don't have enough big clubs in the country to have bigger leagues.

I fail to see how we "would definitely have a better chance of winning a league if we only had to play Celtic twice". The assumption here is Celtic will take more points off us than we will gain from them. Playing them fewer times will reduce the deficit. I get that.

The other side of the equation is that we need to make up the reduced deficit by winning against the diddy teams but we need to win more against them than Celtic. I don't see why Celtic playing diddy teams rather than top 6 teams means less points for Celtic allowing us to overtake them. I don't get that.

Lets face it, Scottish Football's finances are set up to benefit Celtic and Scum to compete in Europe so the SFA/ SPFL suits can pretend we are a country that counts and gives them Euro jollies. Not working very well is it?

There is nothing particularly new here. Celtic have won 9 in a row before. Scum have won 9 in a row before. Boring. Leagues were changed. Scottish
Football got better. But self interest, wanting to match English clubs, wanting to play in England, wanting to put upstart clubs like ourselves back "in our place" and desperation to have enough money to stop the others getting to 10 led to cheating and gerrymandering on a massive communist scale.

Scum wittering on about sporting integrity is disgusting since they and their brothers in arms have done nothing for the last 50 years than circumvent integrity by putting self interest first to the point of massive permitted cheating.

Until the governance and fair financing is sorted wewill not have fair competition.