When I saw the title I realised this could only be about one club and one club alone. Just when you thought a club couldn't get much more despicable they set a new standard every time.

But, regarding the Sheep, can anyone put me right on a point of detail regarding their 11-1 vote shame?

There was a massive, once in a lifetime chance to break the Old Firm voting stranglehold and as we all know the scummy Sheep blew it big time and voted with the Glasgow clubs. My question is this - if Aberdeen had voted against it, ie changing the vote majority required to 10-2 would that have created a situation where home and away gates were shared equally between competing clubs? Or could have been shared equally based on a new resolution for it that got the 10 majority needed? Because if the answer is yes Aberdeen should truly hold their heads in shame.

Further question to those who know these things. Given that the Rangers were liquidated and Sevco started in the bottom tier would there have been an opportunity to change the share of gates rule via 11-1 vote while they were out of the Premier?

These are things that you never think to post about in the hurly burly of a season.