Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
I will look out for it, but fear that our understanding of the word deal will be somewhat different.
Johnsons' various addresses to the nation were made on tv direct to each individual member of the public (or family group). There was no discussion across society, no public meetings with a show of hands for support or public vote of collective approval.

As I see it, the deal Johnson brockered was with each individual member of the public. The thoughts we were asked to consider was 1. do I trust him (do I believe what he is saying is true) 2. If so, am I prepared to put in place the measures he proposed.*

It was delivered as a request and not a demand with the threat of retribution. I see it was more an agreement between the 2 parties based on mutual trust and understanding.* The public, by and large, took Johnson on his word and applied those regulations for the greater good. A few days later, Sunak turned up with a huge wad of cash and sealed the deal.*

For me, that is the true essence of a deal. Perfectly executed, shows the brilliance of Cummings; and you didnt even realise its what happened.*

These philosophies (or series of deals) are played out every day and form the basis of our existence in work relationships, business agreements, sports team player coach relationships, parent/child relationships. Much of its implied, sometimes outlined, often used as motivation. But, there needs to be an underlaying principle of trust and a fair trade (a fair trade off).

How do you see it?