O/T Disgrace Cummings

[wrinkly]

Apologies if it came across that I was patronising you Wrinks. Clearly you can see through him with your comments here. Just trying to warn folks off him in my own clumsy way.

Wi gerron alreight me and thee usually don't we!And long may it continue as far as I'm concerned...

I have always said i don't mind multis as long as they don't put outrageous and offensive stuff on here. I don't think the Kerr character particularly does this but he is a wind up merchant in the extreme andI think you are right most people will take what he says rightly with a pinch of salt.

I will try to reel it in a bit if people are getting fed up with me! People obviously don't want to me to tell their gtandmothers how to suck eggs do they on the topic of kerr's ephemeral nature.

Hey - no offence taken Roly. Certainly we get on and definitely no reason we won't continue to do so. And I know you weren't patronising me - I was just being mischievous

I'm not sure why you think I "see through him" though.
Perhaps my last post had a hint of sarcasm I had not intended but I really do believe he is in the legal profession and I really did think that most other posters believed the same but were pretending otherwise just to have a go at him (and I really do think that Kempo is a retired doctor).

For what it's worth my political leanings are far more aligned with yours than Kerr's. "Commie prick" some would no doubt describe me as.
My opinions differ from Kerr's many times. I rarely post on these points because:
a) There are enough posters contesting him without me adding to it (albeit in a much more objective manner - obviously)
b) The political threads are depressing enough without me joining in.

I commented in this case only because I think his "minimal risk" comments totally miss the point, to the extent that I am really surprised (I know - I keep saying that) that it's him posting them.
Despite his explanation I still think that. I'm happy to agree to differ on that though It's been done to death and neither of us are going to change our minds.

[rolymiller]

Hey - no offence taken Roly. Certainly we get on and definitely no reason we won't continue to do so. And I know you weren't patronising me - I was just being mischievous

I'm not sure why you think I "see through him" though.
Perhaps my last post had a hint of sarcasm I had not intended but I really do believe he is in the legal profession and I really did think that most other posters believed the same but were pretending otherwise just to have a go at him (and I really do think that Kempo is a retired doctor).

For what it's worth my political leanings are far more aligned with yours than Kerr's. "Commie prick" some would no doubt describe me as.
My opinions differ from Kerr's many times. I rarely post on these points because:
a) There are enough posters contesting him without me adding to it (albeit in a much more objective manner - obviously)
b) The political threads are depressing enough without me joining in.

I commented in this case only because I think his "minimal risk" comments totally miss the point, to the extent that I am really surprised (I know - I keep saying that) that it's him posting them.
Despite his explanation I still think that. I'm happy to agree to differ on that though It's been done to death and neither of us are going to change our minds.

Glad i have some pals left on here wrinks! Most folk on here I get on with even the Tories if they have reasonable views. I even agreed with my "arch enemy" Howdy on the Cummings affair! (although he continues to have a side swipe at me! - dunno why if I agreed wi him on summat) . I don't expect anyone to agree with me. I'm not chuffin God (not even to our lass) but if I think someone is putting something outrageous or unfair on here I will challenge it as is my right.

Kerr? I should know better and ignore. If he wants to get himself in bother that's his choice.