The wait goes on ...

[KerrAvon]

No, they need the regulation (rule) change authorising otherwise they'd be acting ultra vires (beyond their powers).

The proposals and the order of business all make sense. What I dont understand is the ridiculous timeframe and constant stretching of that timeframe. That makes me suspicious that theres something else at play, which we arent being made aware of.

I suspect that they are being ultra cautious - making sure that every procedural step is followed to ensure that unhappy clubs can't challenge any rule change upon the basis that there was inadequate consultation or insufficient time to make representations.

[Grumpy King of the West]

I suspect that they are being ultra cautious - making sure that every procedural step is followed to ensure that unhappy clubs can't challenge any rule change upon the basis that there was inadequate consultation or insufficient time to make representations.

Yes, that's logical kerr. But the anxious part of me keeps questioning why macanthony and fry aren't complaining at the time extensions.