Ewm / 1921

[Neil_McDonalds_dick]

The fact is that EWM can and do have it both ways. They effectively own 1921 by virtue of the 'facility'. The shareholdings / directorships of Holdings have been of no consequence for quite some time. The Holdings directors have absolutely no power. They draw no salaries and are there to be continuously blamed for the past errors and for the current / future stagnation. This is perfect for EWM.

EWM do not want to be seen as owners, they prefer to be seen as benign creditors.

It is quite exceptionally poor to suggest that I do not understand. I have given logical explanations of my stance whilst you have done little more than simply disagree without any substantial reasons.