Quote Originally Posted by bill46 View Post
Your self importance knows no bounds.It wasn't a dig at you or anyone. I posted because some didn't seem to know what the deal consisted of.If Struber doesn't want or rate any player why should we be lumbered paying possibly 4/6k a week for a player to sit on his settee at home smoking whatever he was filmed smoking a few months ago.I know you don't like the owners I've no problem with that it's your choice but on this occasion surely they've acted on the fact the manager doesn't rate him rightly or wrongly .The deal was agreed in January not July .Transfers happen at every club but it seems are club are found to be wrong in everything they do and in my view that's got to be wrong.
Stendel for example the once shining light at Oakwell took over a struggling team in Hearts and the first thing he did was to release 2 experienced club legends and replace one of them with a 20 year, old just what a relegation threatened team need.My point being all managers see things from a different perspective to us mere supporters.
From a legal point of view I can't see what more the board could have done.



I have to say bill your "one or two"comment resonated with me as a dig at SB which I know he can take & will defend his position on the club but not as a result of any self importance
Moving on to Stendel any manager will have his own beliefs on any particular player as that is essentially his job but you may wish to refect on his gesture of not taking any wages during his last few months at Hearts not something which is usual in modern football
I seem to recall reading that the prescence of the two experieced players was not condusive to harmony in the club
However relegation at Hearts cost him his job,so so much for that gesture
In conclusion I am yet to see one redeeming feature of our current owners