did you read the article? Typical crappy *journalism* by the P&J, but the main points are:
That the pandemic plan and theory of a second wave are based on assumptions COVID will behave like Influenza and we already have evidence that it may not.
That committing to a rigorous track and trace plan will reduce likelihood of a resurgence.
None of that is at odds with most epidemiologists who assert that track and trace is central to reducing r numbers, so other than partisan reasons what are your problems with those arguments?




Reply With Quote