What is it about there being no explanation that you don't understand? No explanation has been given about why the restrictions were chosen for each location.None. They said the circumstances were different, fair enough but that doesn't answer the legitimate question being asked. It doesn't explain why certain sets of restrictions were appropriate for one and a considerably lesser set of restrictions were applied to the other. That has not been explained.
You talk about the experts advising the FM but she then makes a political decision but refuses to explain, as per the question above. To say a political decision was made on the experts advice without explaining why the advice (or as we expect) the political decision was made is unacceptable. Neither is calling reasonable questions of the government, trying to understand their decisions, ludicrious.




Reply With Quote