Why would you take it that I was laughing at the Maidenhead defeat?! I know you've read all my posts including ones regarding that result. So that's a really bizarre conclusion to make.
I'm laughing at your Real Vs (Covid) Shakhtar reference and the link to Maidenhead Vs Notts. Good game by the way if you missed it, with a couple of fantastic finishes from either side. Happy there was such a shock against the Galaticos.
Let's hope it's only Notts who are inspired by Ukranine powerhouse out of all the covid hit teams in the NL. May give us an edge.
If anyone was using Covid as an excuse, it would be silly seen as we agreed to play the game.
Ardley talked about ‘integrity of the league’ but we obviously thought we would win regardless of the missing players.
Has anyone at the club blamed Covid? If so that's crazy , don't play the game then.
If nobody has then it's another non-story. If we stick with our men with man to man marking defensively on corners we don't lose the game whoever was missing cos of Covid
It wasn't a conclusion, it was quite clearly a question. What part of that did you fail to understand?
So what made you laugh, when I had explained in explicit terms that the point was how teams react to adversity rather than comparing National League to Champions League? That principle applies right down to pub leagues, so again what part of it did you fail to understand?
Again, point completely missed. We don't have to be inspired more than the other teams, being inspired equally should be more than enough.
Sorry Swale, but I don't get the handbags thing here. I posted what I thought was a rational post about our approach to adversity, laddo replied with one of those stupid smiling faces. What does that even mean?
I posted an honest opinion about the Maidenhead game, he posted............................. a silly smiley. Make your own minds up.