Quote Originally Posted by Elite_Pie View Post
Did you miss the post that said "The ‘offer’ was a token one - pay equivalent to what he earned as a first year pro, barely above minimum wage"?

I'm sure he would have stayed if the offer was a reasonable one. It seems that mighty Leamington offered more, which I think says it all.
Yeah cos that post must be true. He was offered a zero hour contract on less than £10 an hour, but only if he played. So essentially he was offered nothing. FACT.
Osborne is average at best. He may improve and play at National League level at some point. He had his moments for sure, but they were too few to justify a significant contract offer. I was more disappointed at Crawford being released. He looked to have progressed and contributed in our good performances prior to lockdown no.1. By all accounts he wasn’t a particularly good trainer and that appears to have been his down fall. With Crawford you could make an argument for him to replace what we have. Osborne isn’t fit enough to lace Cal Roberts boots.