|
| + Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
I'm not a monarchist but see no harm in the Royal Family, it's the extended royal family I don't like. The Spanish model seems OK, a token Royal set up, great tourist attraction and not too costly. I applaud Harry for doing his own thing and becoming self sufficient.
Don't kid yourself that Harry will be self sufficient because when the going gets tough he will be hanging on to his royal heritage more than any of them do. He said that they want to get away from the media and then sign mega contracts with Netflix!
If you want to get away from the media a he claimed, firstly, you don't go living in LA, you go and live in some hick town in mid-USA so that you are away from the media. Secondly, you don't sign up for any contracts with media companies. Thirdly, you don't then ask for an extension of your royal entitlements as he recently did.
He chose this path along with Megan, he was not forced down that path.
I'll bet you that he and his missus and family manage to get a vaccination before any of us or our families on here do, ask yourself why. Nothing to do with his grandmother, however, everything to do with this celebrity obsessed world in which we live.
hmmm....I'd have to imagine that they'd want it, need it, trust it or believe it (the ruse) anyway, would I beleive them ?...well I guess it doesn't matter, because they're Nothing to me...just some old family of money lenders that stole wealth - bought a big army, spread their seed around with others of the same - and played good cop bad cop in order to fortify their position.....and if they have this top crown the people will bow to without question...then it helps normify obedient behaviour and preserve the societal hierachy,
![]()
Don't go killing any swans Norder.
I have often wondered why the "principled" former Royal couple did not just p!$$ off and go and live in a village in Botswana.![]()
I can not support 'royalty.' Each time the history of England floods my mind and I think of how ,in grabs for power ,they must have plundered, stole, simply just taken what would be 'commoners land.' Or kept under their service by our labour. If not by the Monarchy then the Church or some Baron or Earl etc. What should be, this green and pleasant land belongs to all. ( Not about 6.6 billion acres, Elizabeth II is far and away the world's largest landowner.) She hosts several garden parties at Buckingham Palace every year, raising money for various organizations that help those in need. In 2017/18: An estimated 14.3 million people are in poverty in the UK. 8.3 million are working-age adults, 4.6 million are children, and 1.3 million are of pension age. Around 22% of people are in poverty, and 34% children. So I do not support in any way 'royalty', nor any of those claiming some elitist stance. No superiority complex nor inferiority complex should rest over those British Iles.
"The share of UK adults using a mobile phone increased to 95 percent in 2019 as opposed to 94 percent in 2017."
22% of the people are in poverty, 14.3 million of them, yet almost all can afford a mobile phone, and that's before we get to Sky TV, Netflix and Amazon Prime subscriptions, facial jewelry and tatts. It's certainly not poverty as my parents would have defined it, as for my grandparents, they'd have pissed themselves laughing at what's called poverty nowadays.
.
no fear - Kriti...neither beast nor fowl has passed my lips for a long time.
as for a Vaccine....definied as : "a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies" ...that would be a bacterial/viral protein that elicits an immune response - but something these foul mrna "vaccines" themselves dont do, being that they're genetically engineered to Trick the DNA into producing an immune response - so why is it called a Vaccine ?....It's genetic modification ffs, but I guess if they told folk that then their response could be somewhat different.
it's fakery - and where might that lead ?
![]()