BBC parliament chan

[Taintedice]

David icke.....��

Corrupt FM, Corrupt Govt, Corrupt Party.

6 hour and 20 mins.....tis was a thing of beauty.

Do you even know that the likes of Leslie Evans who started all this are employed by the UK govt, not least the MI5 operative in the crown office

[Returnofrros]

Do you even know that the likes of Leslie Evans who started all this are employed by the UK govt, not least the MI5 operative in the crown office

Is she one of the lizard people?

[Taintedice]

The Queen is her ultimate boss so probably

[Returnofrros]

The Queen is her ultimate boss so probably

Touche😆

[BCram]

Oh right, I'm meant to provide evidence but anything Salmond says is taken as fact? Patel's history of bullying is in the public domain. One of her victims attempted suicide. Patel also lost her previous job for secret meetings with the Israeli government but here she is, Home f'n Secretary. This tory govt is the most corrupt in history, no doubt about it.

Sorry if my post came across as aggressive. I assumed that you had some newspaper story or specific comment to support your allegation about Priti Patel. Salmond seems to have everything to back up his claims. Be interesting to get Sturgeon's side of the events.

[hmac]

Why else would they fall out.
I assume that you know about Nicola Sturgeon taking out an interdict in February 2017 to prevent newspapers throughout the U.K. and the U.K. media publishing details of her ***uality.
However the interdict does not cover the newspapers and media outwith the U.K. and on social media.

Couldn’t miss it, you mention it regularly.

Personally couldn’t care less about her ***uality, and I think peddling in it is sad.

[islaydarkblue]

Couldn’t miss it, you mention it regularly.

Personally couldn’t care less about her ***uality, and I think peddling in it is sad.

I do not understand why she hides it by taking out an interdict when it is the ‘talk of the steamie’.

[BCram]

I do not understand why she hides it by taking out an interdict when it is the ‘talk of the steamie’.

Islay, you are the only person who ever mentions it. Does that not give you a clue that perhaps this forum is not bothered?

[Returnofrros]

Islay, you are the only person who ever mentions it. Does that not give you a clue that perhaps this forum is not bothered?

Disagree.

Now that race, colour and ***uality has become political I think it's important to know what you are voting for.

It would be the same if someone seeking power thought the bible was the written word of God....he/she can think that I won't vote for them because of that.

In the same way someone who thinks colour of skin is important and should be legislated for....I wouldn't vote for that.

Someone who is homo***ual is far more likely to introduce liberal socìal laws or implement things like the the race hate bill.....this is of course a democratic choice and lots of folk want this.....I don't so would be less inclined to vote for someone who openly supported these types of things.

The liberal guy was questioned on his Christianity and forced to resign if I remember correctly 're abortion.

[Returnofrros]

Not race hate bill.....hate speech thingy.