O/T puerile free threads

[Elite_Pie]

More than happy to talk about this but before I respond or answer any of your 6 points. Just want to clear something up

I know it was a longtime ago but are you now saying that you didn't specifically ask me, and didn't address the offer directly to me?

You may want to use the search option and go way way back to double check that before we carry this on. Oh and please no amending of quotes , I know that's a favourite tactic of yours.

So you offer free tickets every year and over the years a few have taken you up on this offer from NCM. What a success rate that is lol. Let's put that down to your welcoming persona and sparkling personality.

Yes, I made the offer to you but I have never offered free tickets to you or anyone. I always ask if anyone fancies a day out at Cheltenham on here if I've got seats and tickets spare. The offer I made to you was "pay what you think it was worth", because I was fully confident that you would find travel and entry to the World Cup of jump racing worth at least the £45 I charged. You then resorted to allegations of grooming, and you even mentioned being offered sweets. That's what made me wonder if something has happened in your past that made you think that way. So do you still stand by your grooming allegation?

[laddo]

So that year you did in fact address it to me and specifically offer such a generous package (although there were no mention of cans of beer back then) to me, a stranger. Right glad we cleared that up.

Did you specifically offer it to anyone else that year? Cos I'm pretty certain you offered it specifically to me more than once.

Yes I stand by my tongue in cheek grooming allegation (as pointed out by TSHANO), of course it wasn't an actual grooming attempt, because if it was you wouldn't want a coach loads of friends and family around now would you?

Maybe you struggle to identify when a post on here is tongue in cheek or said seriously. Great example recently with you misinterpretation of my joke post to Swale regarding his 50/50 views on Ardley of he doesn't get them up and all the flak that would surely come his way from the Pitchforks! Which you then quoted and asked everyone else to read ... Say what???? Nobody cares as much as you. That's your problem you care too much.

Seriously how did you think that was serious? I even included a winking smiling emoji to make sure nobody would get confused, not that it was needed. I know Swale didn't take it other than a jokey comment.

Remember I'm 5/95% (stay/go) if we don't go up this season#posterboy?#disciple?

[Elite_Pie]

I remember that particular post, and the comments laddo made were very clearly tongue in cheek, obviously not serious allegations of grooming 😂😂

He's already said on this thread that he fully stands by his allegation of grooming. Don't offer him the "I was only winding him up" excuse.

For any of his faults Laddo’s detractors are equally, and often more so, to blame for a lot of the tediousness on this board. Some of the posters on here the last few days have behaved like they’re having an adverse reaction to a full moon.

Try looking at it this way. Say for example there are around half a dozen posters who get involved in petty arguments - me, Pedro, Davy, KC Notts, Irishpete and laddo. I don't know if you have noticed but there is a clear common denominator in there, and that is laddo. He argues with everyone, the other 5 only argue with him. Simple mathematics suggests that if one of the 5 stop posting, the arguments drop by 20%. If laddo stops posting, the arguments drop by 100%. His mission to improve the board would succeed.

This isn't telling him to go, because he can post whatever he wants. It's just highlighting the massive irony that the person who claims to be on a mission to make the board a better place is actually the person above all others who is making it a worse place.

[Elite_Pie]

Yes I stand by my tongue in cheek grooming allegation (as pointed out by TSHANO), of course it wasn't an actual grooming attempt, because if it was you wouldn't want a coach loads of friends and family around now would you?

So you've realised that you've dug yourself into a very deep hole and are now trying to wriggle out. This is what you posted yesterday:

The grooming accusation was aimed solely at you and I fully stand by it.

At least you've show everyone your true colours on this one!

[kill_the_drum]

It is getting very tedious on this board with seemingly every thread being hijacked by the same people.
Me and Pedro have had our moments, but for the sake of not becoming part of the problem I’m now ignoring his opinions rather than rising to them, of which he’s totally entitled to make.
The thing is we all support the same team and would probably all get on like a house on fire over a pint.
Regardless of who I agree/disagree with, it’s boring for everyone else to read, so just don’t rise to each other’s posts.

[laddo]

So you've realised that you've dug yourself into a very deep hole and are now trying to wriggle out. This is what you posted yesterday:

The grooming accusation was aimed solely at you and I fully stand by it.

At least you've show everyone your true colours on this one!

I do stand by it. I can't help if you have a real problem with identifying

If I was being serious I'd be informing the authorities not posting on an open forum. I've highlighted that appear unable to recognise anything said in jest, or not seriously there isn't much more I can do. Unless of course you only struggle with this when it concerns me. That wouldn't surprise me because your consistent use of double standards and inconsistencies is there for all to see. You aren't in a position to call anyone a hypocrite that's for sure.

It's not so much what is posted it's who is posting it. You readily turn a blind eye when it's suits (Navy, Pedro, Davy etc) but are quick on the trigger when it's me.

I wonder why? Hmmmmmmmm.

I'm happy to highlight the above, repeatedly.

[Elite_Pie]

I do stand by it. I can't help if you have a real problem with identifying

If I was being serious I'd be informing the authorities not posting on an open forum. I've highlighted that appear unable to recognise anything said in jest, or not seriously there isn't much more I can do. Unless of course you only struggle with this when it concerns me. That wouldn't surprise me because your consistent use of double standards and inconsistencies is there for all to see. You aren't in a position to call anyone a hypocrite that's for sure.

It's not so much what is posted it's who is posting it. You readily turn a blind eye when it's suits (Navy, Pedro, Davy etc) but are quick on the trigger when it's me.

I wonder why? Hmmmmmmmm.

I'm happy to highlight the above, repeatedly.

You can wriggle and squirm all you want, but the truth is that you've made yourself look rather weird on this thread!

It's all there in black and white for everyone to see.

[laddo]

He's already said on this thread that he fully stands by his allegation of grooming. Don't offer him the "I was only winding him up" excuse.



Try looking at it this way. Say for example there are around half a dozen posters who get involved in petty arguments - me, Pedro, Davy, KC Notts, Irishpete and laddo. I don't know if you have noticed but there is a clear common denominator in there, and that is laddo. He argues with everyone, the other 5 only argue with him. Simple mathematics suggests that if one of the 5 stop posting, the arguments drop by 20%. If laddo stops posting, the arguments drop by 100%. His mission to improve the board would succeed.

This isn't telling him to go, because he can post whatever he wants. It's just highlighting the massive irony that the person who claims to be on a mission to make the board a better place is actually the person above all others who is making it a worse place.

That's because I highlight and call out those posters. I disagree with some of the stuff they say the vast majority to do with Notts (please note it's about Notts as in NCM). They do the same they disagree with me also hence the debates/arguments about football.

I also disagree with others, whatever side of the Ardley debate they are on. Spread it around.

You on the other hand, and no doubt others on that list are far more selective. You very rarely quote any of the other names mentioned. So you either agree with everything they say (having read a lot of Davy's and Pedro's post that's literally impossible) or you just choose to turn a blind eye to all their posts every single time?

Double standards, inconsistences at play again.

I could ask why you do this but I know, we all know. Your primary reason for using NCM is to indulge in petty long standing arguments , which we all know you did before I popped up again. How long did the Tricky Trees arguing last , it was the same tedious relentless petty stuff we do now but I wasn't posting then just reading and ignoring. Lots of people highlighted it, told you and him it was dull, tedious ruining threads. You of course ignore the pleas from fellow Notts fans.

Your response was and still is freedom of speech, if you don't like it don't read it or NCM isn't for you.

Your second reason for using NCM is of course Notts.

That should explain the above picture you paint.

As I've said before you ignore me , I ignore you and NCM would be a better place for all, that's undisputable. It's that simple.

I've offered this solution more than once to you and you reject it because you don't want to change, don't want to improve the board for others or more likely you couldn't do it

You Sir are obsessed and you don't even recognise it. Once you do, you are on the first step to getting better#babysteps.

[Ayeayeskipper]

That's because I highlight and call out those posters. I disagree with some of the stuff they say the vast majority to do with Notts (please note it's about Notts as in NCM). They do the same they disagree with me also hence the debates/arguments about football.

I also disagree with others, whatever side of the Ardley debate they are on. Spread it around.

You on the other hand, and no doubt others on that list are far more selective. You very rarely quote any of the other names mentioned. So you either agree with everything they say (having read a lot of Davy's and Pedro's post that's literally impossible) or you just choose to turn a blind eye to all their posts every single time?

Double standards, inconsistences at play again.

I could ask why you do this but I know, we all know. Your primary reason for using NCM is to indulge in petty long standing arguments , which we all know you did before I popped up again. How long did the Tricky Trees arguing last , it was the same tedious relentless petty stuff we do now but I wasn't posting then just reading and ignoring. Lots of people highlighted it, told you and him it was dull, tedious ruining threads. You of course ignore the pleas from fellow Notts fans.

Your response was and still is freedom of speech, if you don't like it don't read it or NCM isn't for you.

Your second reason for using NCM is of course Notts.

That should explain the above picture you paint.

As I've said before you ignore me , I ignore you and NCM would be a better place for all, that's undisputable. It's that simple.

I've offered this solution more than once to you and you reject it because you don't want to change, don't want to improve the board for others or more likely you couldn't do it

You Sir are obsessed and you don't even recognise it. Once you do, you are on the first step to getting better#babysteps.

Good luck with understanding any of that Elite.

[Elite_Pie]

As I've said before you ignore me , I ignore you and NCM would be a better place for all, that's undisputable. It's that simple.

And I've posted a mathematical formula to prove that if you stopped posting, NCM would be a better place for all. It's that simple.

You're the one pretending to be on a mission to improve NCM, not me.