Signing Backgrounds

[ncfcog]

So I have had a quick and basic look at where we have signed players from. I have ignored loan players. The vast majority of our squad do not have a background in this division. There are one or two good ones to come out of this such as Wootton probably being the number one EFL signing for example but by and large my opinion is that this recruitment strategy is not working. Take a look at the list below. Interestingly the few we have brought in from NL are all pretty good. Of the EFL ones Lacey, Rawlinson and Wootton and Slocombe I would keep. Still hard even at this stage to pass comment on Sam and Rodrigues. I do think we need to be looking more at non league for players. They will be cheaper, more accustomed to the rigors of the division and probably more eager. The majority of that side won't be playing for us next season regardless of the division we are in.


Player Club
Slocombe Bristol Rovers EFL
Pilling Tranmere EFL
Brindley Bromley NL
Turner Mansfield EFL
Barnett Oldham EFL
Rawlinson Port Vale EFL
Mccrory Burton EFL
Kelly Evans Kettering NL
Chicksen Bolton EFL
Alex Lacey Gillingham EFL
Reeves Bradford EFL
O'Brien Bradford EFL
Doyle Coventry EFL
Wootton S****horpe EFL
Roberts Morpeth NL
Boldjewinn Crawley EFL
Rodrigues Portugal N/A
Sam Holland N/A

I think every single one of them has had experience of playing at a higher level, in fact when you start doing the background checks you do start to wonder why they aren’t tearing this league up.

[Glad2BeAPie]

I think every single one of them has had experience of playing at a higher level, in fact when you start doing the background checks you do start to wonder why they aren’t tearing this league up.

Our negative style of play might be a a reason

[LaxtonLad]

Our negative style of play might be a a reason

It can only be the manager, can't it? What other reason can there be for players brought in by Marmite to change from being effective at their last club to being really average, or worse, when they come under his influence, then back to decent players when they leave? I strongly suspect the positive play and goals scored by Notts occur when two or three players abandon Ardley's caucus race. They use their own footballing experience to abandon the caution of looking for someone in space - there isn't anybody there - or passing the ball back into minefield, and just have a go at it.

If Dear Leader thinks we can top this league by playing a la Man. City he ought to try buying millionaire players but I reckon he would turn them into non-league stuff within a month.

[nw6pie]

I think every single one of them has had experience of playing at a higher level, in fact when you start doing the background checks you do start to wonder why they aren’t tearing this league up.

I’d be surprised if most of the players at NL level haven’t drifted down the leagues over the years or are on loan from league clubs - Woking have Matt Jarvis and he’s played at the top level for Wolves and West Ham. I’m sure Solihull had someone who’d gone for big transfer sums over the years when we played them, too.

The test for me is how many of the players listed above genuinely look too good for this league? Not many in overall play, and the only difference is perhaps the number of great goal we score compared to other teams in the division.

[the_anticlough]

I agree with the posters on this thread that say its the deployment not the recruitment..
The recruitment's been pretty varied really and isn't the issue IMO.

Two points though...
The way to get out of this league is to pack the team with players who are too good for it. The way to stay is to pack the team with players who belong here (remembering it's only 1 up from 24 clubs and then the trials of the play-offs for another 1). So no to a lot more recruitment from the NL

The worst recruitment over the past ten or so years has been the old pros/bigger names at the end of their careers - Stead/Smith/Doyle/O'Brien/Turner have been the most frustrating players I've seen and they get picked time after time after time...

[TSANHO]

I agree with the posters on this thread that say its the deployment not the recruitment..
The recruitment's been pretty varied really and isn't the issue IMO.

Two points though...
The way to get out of this league is to pack the team with players who are too good for it. The way to stay is to pack the team with players who belong here (remembering it's only 1 up from 24 clubs and then the trials of the play-offs for another 1). So no to a lot more recruitment from the NL

The worst recruitment over the past ten or so years has been the old pros/bigger names at the end of their careers - Stead/Smith/Doyle/O'Brien/Turner have been the most frustrating players I've seen and they get picked time after time after time...

+1 for those saying that it’s the deployment of the tactics, not the personnel, that’s causing us most problems.

I’ve said before that some of the players look lost, or like strangers, so maybe they just don’t fully understand what the hell Ardley is on about....the manager has said himself that the players haven’t done as they’ve been told to on numerous occasions.

I can’t see it changing now but it should be simple, especially in this division....

Win the midfield early, and when you do keep your foot on the throat of the opposition and don’t let up until the game is won. Only once you have the midfield can you play your fancy football....we seem to forget this is every game we play. How many times in the last two seasons have our midfield dominated an opposition in this way? I’m honestly struggling to think of a single game. I thought this was the very basic foundations of winning a game.

[the_anticlough]

Win the midfield early, and when you do keep your foot on the throat of the opposition and don’t let up until the game is won. Only once you have the midfield can you play your fancy football....we seem to forget this is every game we play. How many times in the last two seasons have our midfield dominated an opposition in this way? I’m honestly struggling to think of a single game. I thought this was the very basic foundations of winning a game.

I think you're getting to the heart of the problem. The Kings Lynn game - the lasting impression is of a really disconnected team, the defenders struggling to use the ball from the back and the forward players starved of decent possession - it's the midfield that should be joining up the dots and connecting these parts. Ardley's system is all about his playing patterns, 'playing through the lines' from the back. When the midfield fails to do this it's going to look ugly.