Leeds United - v - Sheffield United ***Matchday Thread***

[WTF11]

Agree 100% Allioski gets a lot of bad press for not being the best left back in the league - but as you rightly point out he was never a left back before joining us, or indeed under our previous managers, however, Philips wasn't a defensive midfielder until Bielsa made him one, Dallas was a right winger at Brentford, Costa was a left winger, Ayling was originally a center back and on and on - Bielsa EXPECTS all his players to be able to play several positions, Allioski is no differenet in that respect, where I do agree withy you is that he gets stick on a regular basis whereas others don't if they are playing "Out of position" and I do think he has been a fabulous aquisition over the last 4 years, and in my opinion will be sadly missed if he does go this summer, always loved the guy, particularly when he wound Appo Halme up in the tunnel before the away game at Barnsley last season!

No argument regarding his limited ability to flex and perform to the max with the changing requirements from Bielsa (at least when compared to some of the others (although not all, the newbies like Koch and Llorente appear not to fall into the "flexible" player category)), and we definitely agree on how much stick he gets! I suppose had the club acquired a "natural left back" he (Alioski) might find it harder to get 1st team game time.

Anyway, I suspect he will leave (although I still hope he doesn't). Just hope it's not for that club, no matter how many bridges need to be built I wouldn't want the first (and hardest) to be on the back of a real club stalwart joining them.

[cherrypie7]

No argument regarding his limited ability to flex and perform to the max with the changing requirements from Bielsa (at least when compared to some of the others (although not all, the newbies like Koch and Llorente appear not to fall into the "flexible" player category)), and we definitely agree on how much stick he gets! I suppose had the club acquired a "natural left back" he (Alioski) might find it harder to get 1st team game time.

Anyway, I suspect he will leave (although I still hope he doesn't). Just hope it's not for that club, no matter how many bridges need to be built I wouldn't want the first (and hardest) to be on the back of a real club stalwart joining them.

My point wtf is that Alioski had a bad game, in my opinion. We can make many very valid excuses for him having a bad game, (mine was that he played 3 internationals; see above) but one shouldn't deny that he wasn't at his best.
As for a specialist left back, Orta did actually try to fill this hole with Barry Douglas. He (Douglas) was pretty good until he got injured, and for some reason never seemed to be at his best again.

[WTF11]

My point wtf is that Alioski had a bad game, in my opinion. We can make many very valid excuses for him having a bad game, (mine was that he played 3 internationals; see above) but one shouldn't deny that he wasn't at his best.
As for a specialist left back, Orta did actually try to fill this hole with Barry Douglas. He (Douglas) was pretty good until he got injured, and for some reason never seemed to be at his best again.

Wouldn't disagree that he put in a less than stellar performance, but he wasn't alone. With respect I disagree with the comment about the other under-par players being Blades. I thought Llorente was invisible and way to easily flustered when he was in close proximity to play, Rodrigo was ineffectual as a replacement for Bamford (who was also very quiet), and Cooper needs to wean himself off the incessant passing back to the keeper, that nearly cost us dear, again.

As for The Douglas issue, as you say, he was never the same on return from injury in late 2019. We're now at the end of the 20/21 season, no club should be waiting around that long to replace a player who may or may not be effective when (if) they return from injury (again). We have managed to go out to market for other defensive, midfield, and attacking players, what is so difficult about doing the same for LB?

[cherrypie7]

To change the subject a little, I looked at Baldock's tackle again (2x). I am sure this has been brought up ad nauseum, but thats a red card. he did not seem to have any intention of going for the ball. It was reckless because if Roberts didn't jump, something nasty could have occurred. Can someone explain to me why that wasn't even a yellow card?

[WTF11]

To change the subject a little, I looked at Baldock's tackle again (2x). I am sure this has been brought up ad nauseum, but thats a red card. he did not seem to have any intention of going for the ball. It was reckless because if Roberts didn't jump, something nasty could have occurred. Can someone explain to me why that wasn't even a yellow card?

Because the referee was more concerned about the "concussion" possibility (which I'd have more sympathy with if wasn't a plain as the nose on his face that Baldock stayed down and played on the bounce of the turf to deflect (successfully) from the danger of his challenge), and........

The bell-ends who were manning VAR that day couldn't find a "clear error" with both hands if their lives depended on it.

My question would be...."Why, if cards (yellows and reds) can be challenged (and in some cases overturned), why is it not possible (now we have the technology) to administer post-match punishments when it's so blatantly clear that the on-the-day officials (on site and remote) got it so badly wrong?"