Nust....

[Geordie1974]

Well I am right behind it. If its a choice to donate and possibly give the fans a voice under new ownership or give money to a multi-billionaire for Season tickets, that has destroyed the club and split the fanbase, then I know where my money will go.
If it doesn't go off it will go to charity.

[TANYA_]

Well I am right behind it. If its a choice to donate and possibly give the fans a voice under new ownership or give money to a multi-billionaire for Season tickets, that has destroyed the club and split the fanbase, then I know where my money will go.
If it doesn't go off it will go to charity.

each to their own but, from what i know about shareholdings, every single shareholder gets a voice and a vote on decisions regarding the structure, safeguarding and direction the company is to go.

Ballots are held and votes counted. The reason i would not even bother with this is because if the fans collectively held a 1% share that does not reflect the decision in the running of the club.

Each fan that is a member of the pledge fund will need to have a vote internally with NUST because not every fan who have pledged will be a shareholder, NUST will hold a 1% share NOT THE FANS.

NUST will then put forward their vote on behalf of the members.

That 1% vote will count for nothing when the majority shareholder has 99% sharehold and can vote against NUST with 99/1 superiority.

Mike Ashley is against it and the PIF consortium know nothing about it either so its like wiping your backside before you have had a ****