"You've strayed away from a logical line of thought, backed up by evidence, and taken a view which is purely one of faith and belief".

Neither of us has an explanation for the wave / particle result. You ascribe it to us being in a simulation and press me to provide proof to the contrary. I do not believe that it is the case that you have provided anything remotely resembling proof that this result indicates that we are in a simulation. You have merely stated the exotic belief and stated that I should provide proof that it is not so. I am choosing the default plain ordinary doubt versus your belief in the exotic. The burden of proof is on the believer in the exotic. There is no such proof. There could be numerous explanations for the wave / particle result and we do not yet know them or indeed one explanation and we do not know it.

I feel that you believe the same as me but you see it as a challenge to put the exotic case. I do appreciate your interesting theory.

This is an enthralling topic but we have reached an impasse. Gainsaying each other would not be productive. We understand each other.