No. You're disappointing me.

I did not ask you for proof simulation theory was not evidenced by wave/particle duality.

I asked you to provide an alternate explanation.

You can't say "neither of us have an explanation for the wave/particle result" when I've provided an explanation already (which you admit you are unable to disprove).

I have not reached any impasse and am freely able to provide other explanations. Is it possible you, on the other hand, have reached the limit of your programming as an artificial construct and are unable to compute any further?