Sutton Utd

[bule1]

Like I said did you not see him insulting me several times?so I accept your apology and cant wait to see you rebuke 61p for his remarks aswell
Xxx
Ps I think I've been very tame lately since my ban infact.
May I ask if you were or are in the pro Ardley camp?
I only ask as its all about perspective

I am in the pro NCFC camp, neither pro/anti Ardley. On a positive for him when we were possibly going to cease to exist, he stayed and in very little time built up a team that got to the playoff final. On the negative his playoff final was bad, second season OK(ish) but not confident we would have got promoted. Therefore whilst I would have remained loyal my confidence would not have been great.

If your asking if IB is better that NA, the answer is yes. The one pro Ardley point I will make is that if he left we would have had nothing as a squad last season at the start.


Final point is regardless of the pro/anti Ardley battle all deserve respect for their opinions. Please to all, either side, keep it balanced.

[magpie_mania]

I am in the pro NCFC camp, neither pro/anti Ardley. On a positive for him when we were possibly going to cease to exist, he stayed and in very little time built up a team that got to the playoff final. On the negative his playoff final was bad, second season OK(ish) but not confident we would have got promoted. Therefore whilst I would have remained loyal my confidence would not have been great.

If your asking if IB is better that NA, the answer is yes. The one pro Ardley point I will make is that if he left we would have had nothing as a squad last season at the start.


Final point is regardless of the pro/anti Ardley battle all deserve respect for their opinions. Please to all, either side, keep it balanced.

Good post.

It is simply not just black and white! I was pro-Ardley when he was here, but that doesn't mean that he did no wrong in my eyes. No team in any league has any right to win promotion, just because of budget, or tradition. Look at the Championship table, how dare Brentford get into the play-off final while teams like Derby and Forest finish near the bottom (neither team got a win in their last 5 matches).

Now I am pro-Burchnall. And will be unless things get really bad.

[Elite_Pie]

Ageism?

Have you ever posted insults regarding age laddo?

Think carefully before you answer.

[laddo]

Have you ever posted insults regarding age laddo?

Think carefully before you answer.

I don't have to Yes, you know that already. You've probably highlighted it 90% of the time. Yet when it's someone else, anyone else it's 0% of the time.

Looks like the 0% streak continues

#balancenotbias

[Elite_Pie]

I don't have to Yes, you know that already. You've probably highlighted it 90% of the time. Yet when it's someone else, anyone else it's 0% of the time.

Looks like the 0% streak continues

#balancenotbias

So you admit to posting insults regarding age, but call others who do the same. How does that work?

I must have told a hundred times why I highlight your repeated hipocrisy but ignore the hipocrisy of others. It's because you claim to be on a 'mission', and no other poster makes that claim.

[laddo]

Past tense, it's that simple. We've moved on, I've moved on, people have changed#memo

Well most people, sadly a few are still stuck in the past but they seem happy lol.

There are three tenses: past, present and future. You are referring to the past, I am referring to the present. That's how it works.

Don't talk about the #mission when you openly admit you don't know what it is.

It's hard to take you seriously when you are so blinkered and biased. You used to be all for suggesting conversations be moved to the handbags thread when things got personal and away from Notts, yet here is another prime example and you say nothing. How does that work?

[PedroTheFisherman66]

So you admit to posting insults regarding age, but call others who do the same. How does that work?

I must have told a hundred times why I highlight your repeated hipocrisy but ignore the hipocrisy of others. It's because you claim to be on a 'mission', and no other poster makes that claim.

is he Saddo talking %h1te again?
Has he revealed what his/the mission is yet and does he still pretend he doesn't read the handbags thread ?
I thought he would be loving life when 61P comes on backing him up by saying I'm infatuated with the sad one I bet they both need new underpants by the time they finished each other off ?!

[PedroTheFisherman66]

I am in the pro NCFC camp, neither pro/anti Ardley. On a positive for him when we were possibly going to cease to exist, he stayed and in very little time built up a team that got to the playoff final. On the negative his playoff final was bad, second season OK(ish) but not confident we would have got promoted. Therefore whilst I would have remained loyal my confidence would not have been great.

If your asking if IB is better that NA, the answer is yes. The one pro Ardley point I will make is that if he left we would have had nothing as a squad last season at the start.


Final point is regardless of the pro/anti Ardley battle all deserve respect for their opinions. Please to all, either side, keep it balanced.

So by the sounds of it you were pro Ardley but have now had your head turned by a better coach but that's good to hear it takes a strong man to admit he was wrong.
I'm still not seeing you respond to any of the baiting / insults that 61P threw my way and the insults that I was responding to.
Also it would be nice if you could post some of these aggressive posts that you say I am guilty of writing that has lead you to that impression, I believe in the past few weeks you said.
I don't want you to turn out like one of our fellow posters on here that has called me a liar and a hypocrite but when asked to post any supporting evidence crumbled into a corner ,I would like to say to never to be heard again but that would be lying.
Personally I think some of my posts are challenging the holders view and I am open to persuasion if a convincing response is forthcoming.
my views are no secret I openly admit to them and I admit if some one comes on insulting me then I will respond in kind , I think that's fair enough, possibly you don't as you have not mentioned a word against 61P as yet.

[Elite_Pie]

Don't talk about the #mission when you openly admit you don't know what it is.

It's hard to take you seriously when you are so blinkered and biased. You used to be all for suggesting conversations be moved to the handbags thread when things got personal and away from Notts, yet here is another prime example and you say nothing. How does that work?

Nobody knows what the 'mission' is apart from you, because you won't tell us despite being asked many times. I will willingly take threads to handbags if you agree to do the same. Instead, you claim that "things have moved on", yet you still seem happy to pollute topics with your endless petty personal arguments.

[Ayeayeskipper]

is he Saddo talking %h1te again?
Has he revealed what his/the mission is yet and does he still pretend he doesn't read the handbags thread ?
I thought he would be loving life when 61P comes on backing him up by saying I'm infatuated with the sad one I bet they both need new underpants by the time they finished each other off ?!

"again" Pedro! The tw@t's never stopped talking sh1te. Oh, for all the bedwetters ( who shouldn't be reading this anyway ), that wasn't an insult.