+ Visit Dundee United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 62 of 98 FirstFirst ... 1252606162636472 ... LastLast
Results 611 to 620 of 972

Thread: Mellon gone and Hughes incoming

  1. #611
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,551
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim_Jam View Post
    Micky Mellon wanted to go in a different direction to Dundee United strategy -

    I would like this explained to me.

    Which direction did Mellon want to go? (I don't mean England)

    Bring in some of his own players and faze in youth?
    He wanted the club to be renamed Tranmere Rovers and for it to relocated down to Merseyside

  2. #612
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    2,300
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim_Jam View Post
    Micky Mellon wanted to go in a different direction to Dundee United strategy -

    I would like this explained to me.

    Which direction did Mellon want to go? (I don't mean England)

    Bring in some of his own players and faze in youth?
    From what I've heard he wanted to mainly recruit players that were 28/29/30, experienced heads. Whereas the club felt we had enough of those around the squad now (which is correct) and look to focus on Fuchs/Shankland types of signings where we sign them at 23/24 and they have a potential sell-on value whilst improving the team and also keeping a pathway for the youngsters.

    Could all be sh1te, as there have been so many stories. But that was from an 'ITK'.

  3. #613
    Quote Originally Posted by BudMill90 View Post
    This is what Mochrie, Neilson, Fotheringham, Freeman, Graham, Cooney, Meekison, Hoti all did in stages last season. I'd be surprised if any go on Loan next season (apart from probably Cooney who didn't get a lot of game time on loan) as I think the club will want to them to get given a chance to see what they can offer.

    The thing with the current United squad, assuming no one leaves, is that we are probably 2/3 players away from easily being top 6 level. A centre half to play beside Edwards that is at his level or better, a central midfielder to play in beside Fuchs, and then a out and out winger to play on the left and we have a team that looks like this:

    Benji
    Smith, Edwards, New CB, Robson
    Chalmers, Fuchs, New CM, New LM
    Shankland, Appere

    I know that team is just off the top of my head, but if all of those new signings are at the level of Edwards & Fuchs then that is a line-up that I'd be confident with going onto most games. Yes, we could do with better full-backs, but the positions I have mentioned are of more importance at the minute.

    So then you bring the youngsters in and you are maybe playing Mochrie or Meekison in behind Shanks. Or you put Fotheringham out left mid. Or Freeman comes into one of the fullback slots.

    Could one of the young CB's fill that slot beside Edwards all season? I wouldn't be so sure and would want much stronger, experienced full backs to be 100% happy with Edwards and Smith/Neilson/Graham as a centre back pairing. But we saw last season that the Premiership isn't as difficult a place as we think at times. Yes there were some brutal matches but we also got a clean sheet against Celtic with Smith, Edwards, Reynolds, Robson as the back 4. We got 4 clean sheets against Aberdeen with all of the previously mentioned guys plus Neilson and Connolly in there too. So it's not like we are coming up against top quality teams every week.

    The most important thing is that we bring in a 2 or 3 players to improve the current starting 11. I'd rather have Courts as manager plus these 3 new players, than McInnes but not make any new signings. I know thats not a situation that is likely to play out, but you know what I mean.

    It's a massive summer and we can't afford to mess up recruitment. For me, its more important that the head coach appointment.
    i get what you're saying bud but this is best case scenario as far as players of the Edwards/Fuchs ilk are concerned, im not getting the vibe from the club that we will be strengthening as the emphasis is on giving youth a chance, to then flog for cash.

    For me the manager/head coach is the most important position as i cant see how Tam will bring and progress players careers for us, all i can see happening is players thrown in at the deep end and alot of pumpings knocking the confidence even more

  4. #614
    Quote Originally Posted by JUSTaway View Post
    Yes if we can keep siegrist, Edwards, Fuchs, shanks, and strengthen in certain Areas, some youngsters emerging to make impact, team could be ok next Season. If Courts appointed, Onus totally on ashgar to give him the tools. Recruitment Massive, nightmare scenario we loše some of these players, and recruit poor.
    we lose them and we will more than likely go down

  5. #615
    Quote Originally Posted by BudMill90 View Post
    100%

    Look at 2015/16.

    Players that left:

    Keith Watson
    Calum Butcher
    Jarek Fojut
    Rado Cierzniak
    Nadir Ciftci

    Players we replaced them with at the start of the season:

    Zwick/Szromnik
    Donaldson
    Durnan
    Bill McKay
    Aaron Kuhl
    Darko Bodul

    There are more but I'm about being sick just typing those names.

    If the players that left all stayed, we would never have been relegated in 2016. We could have lost Nadir and still stayed up, but losing Butcher, Watson, Fojut and Rado were a nightmare for us. Then you have Paton, Dixon, Erskine all getting major injuries that ruled them out long terms at the start of the season and we were always right up against it.

    Benji, Edwards, Fuchs and Shanks are our most important players (by a country mile btw) so if any one of them leave, we CANNOT rely on anyone else at the club to replace them. We need to recruit players close to or above their level.

    As for the rest of the squad, I feel all other players who were in our 'best' 11 all have fairly able replacements already at the club. Full back for example, Freeman and Sporle aren't miles away from Smith and Robson.
    bang on, apart fae the last bit Robson is lowping and Sporle isnt looking like a defender at all

  6. #616
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    2,300
    Quote Originally Posted by offshore_arab83 View Post
    bang on, apart fae the last bit Robson is lowping and Sporle isnt looking like a defender at all
    Yea mate in an ideal world we get a new left back who is above their level. Canna see it being a priority position though.

  7. #617
    Quote Originally Posted by BudMill90 View Post
    Yea mate in an ideal world we get a new left back who is above their level. Canna see it being a priority position though.
    nah i know mate, its a 'nice to have' we really need someone to create if shanks is staying eh

  8. #618
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,534
    Quote Originally Posted by BudMill90 View Post
    100%

    Look at 2015/16.

    Players that left:

    Keith Watson
    Calum Butcher
    Jarek Fojut
    Rado Cierzniak
    Nadir Ciftci

    Players we replaced them with at the start of the season:

    Zwick/Szromnik
    Donaldson
    Durnan
    Bill McKay
    Aaron Kuhl
    Darko Bodul

    There are more but I'm about being sick just typing those names.

    If the players that left all stayed, we would never have been relegated in 2016. We could have lost Nadir and still stayed up, but losing Butcher, Watson, Fojut and Rado were a nightmare for us. Then you have Paton, Dixon, Erskine all getting major injuries that ruled them out long terms at the start of the season and we were always right up against it.

    Benji, Edwards, Fuchs and Shanks are our most important players (by a country mile btw) so if any one of them leave, we CANNOT rely on anyone else at the club to replace them. We need to recruit players close to or above their level.

    As for the rest of the squad, I feel all other players who were in our 'best' 11 all have fairly able replacements already at the club. Full back for example, Freeman and Sporle aren't miles away from Smith and Robson.
    The bottom line is - sell too many, too quickly, and replace them inadequately and you’re rubber ducked. We saw that in, as you say, 2015/16. In contrast the 2010 team wasn’t just suddenly ‘arrived’ at - it was built over a good 3-4 seasons.But we still sold - Barry Robson and Noel Hunt being the obvious two off the top off my head. But the difference was that the ‘replacements’ for these players were already at the Club and the sales were genuinely part of a long term strategy with the interests of the first team front and centre in the selling policy.

    That’s what the Snake forgot to our eternal detriment. He prioritised the bottom line over the team on the pitch whereas there should always be a balance between the two. He failed to do that and we’re still living with it’s consequences even now. I pray that the Club doe not allow lightning to strike twice.

  9. #619
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    5,915
    Quote Originally Posted by offshore_arab83 View Post
    we lose them and we will more than likely go down
    yes Edwards and siegrist especially - i expect our keeper is going but really want to keep edwards

  10. #620
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    5,915
    so Jim duffy being interviewed today - john brown and Ivano bonetti already interviewed and did well.

Page 62 of 98 FirstFirst ... 1252606162636472 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •