Wales surpassed England because they only had 3 shots but 1 was on target so that is 33% whereas England had 9 shots but only 11% were on target!
10 men, hope they're better with 10 men.
Wales surpassed England because they only had 3 shots but 1 was on target so that is 33% whereas England had 9 shots but only 11% were on target!
Careful Supersub, you may become Superstatto. I do appreciate your perspective though, mine is too emotional.
.
Franc v GaL...a desperate show and an offence to behold.....and Erman v Ung, a dithering mess of dull apathy.
a sad night for the game.
..
The media will now go into Deutscher overload.
WW2, 1966 and 5-1 in Munich.
.
out of interest.
Top 20 foreign nationals who play in the PL. 20/21
Interesting stats those Norder, two things stand out, I'm sure there are good reasons but I don't know what they are, 35 players from France but only 10 from Germany, 52 from Spain and Portugal combined, but only 6 from Italy. I wasn't expecting discrepancies like that.
.
well, can chuck a few ideas out Sinkov....the obvious, PL wages ? - unless the French big boys bag them, PSG Marseille Lyon etc...am not so sure the likes of Bordeaux and Brest can compete, same with Spain, Barca/Madrids....Grenada to Cadiz etc....the Italians - are Italian, mother wants to cook her boy Spag and will get heart palpitations if he leaves the country " mamma mia ! "....and the boys with violin cases might not like it either.....and Germany, German loyalty (others historical hangups?)....oh, and spargel and potato washed down with good pilsner.
For the first 15 mins I thought Wales had this sorted, 2 good attempts by Bale then it was all Denmark, going in with a deserved HT lead which could have been more. Interesting that the neutrals are supporting Denmark, is this because they associate Wales with England or becuase they know the Welsh don't like England?