Quote Originally Posted by Whitfieldarab View Post
Of course it was the cheapest option. The club went on record as saying they interviewed loads of applicants,so if that's true and and they wanted to go down this so called style of coaching do you think they only interviewed loads of Tam Courts type coaches???......no neither do I. They had him earmarked from day 1 and prolonged his announcement due to fan unrest.

I really do wish Tam Courts all the best but still maintain this job is beyond his capabilities and that getting rid of MM was a big mistake.
It was the cheapest option yes, but is that why he was given the job? I don't believe so. That's what some of us are getting at by saying he wasn't the 'cheap option'. His appointment wasn't financially motivated.