+ Visit Leeds United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 115

Thread: Those of you who had Covid....

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozwhites View Post
    If everyone stayed isolated or in lockdown when asked to do so, then it can and has been controlled. And they dont sneak across State borders which has been the main problem! Not eradicated totally, but controlled. Absolutely no new cases here in Qld for several days. But then again, Im only living amongst our situation here....and you are the "world" expert on everything! Again....
    Human beings are sociable animals, out genetics, physiology, psychology and behavioural characteristics over millenia show that to be fact. Some will be able to live with sealed borders, but only for a time (as has been shown), Queensland is one place, not sealed off and certainly not "secure", neither is anywhere else in Australia, nor (despite the holier than thou pronouncements of its premier), is New Zealand. Vaccination, vaccination, vaccination, to paraphrase Mr Hilton.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,307
    Quote Originally Posted by hopelesslyoptimistic View Post
    If you are looking for views on vaccines the inventor of the MRNA vaccine technology has spoken widely and whilst still on balance recommending people have them acknowledges the risks from this vaccine - it spreads from the site of the injection more widely that traditional vaccine and that the spike protein is potentially toxic and could affect people. Symptoms which might be vaccine related are not really being widely collated as such as most believe that the vaccine is safe.

    What seems clear is that if you had the virus badly, recovered and if you are young then your immunity levels should be just as good and probably better than if you just have the vaccine - your immune system will recognise the whole virus and not just one feature.

    Time - the one thing we don’t have - will tell - but if I were 25 am not sure I would have had the vaccine just yet but waited a while to see how things pan out.
    Disgraceful. I suspect you consider yourself a scientist and from.what have said previously you have some involvement in healthcare, yet you continue to peddle the anti-vax sh1te regarding the benefits of the vaccination as it applies to the younger cohort.

    Ifs and buts count for f00k all, the one thing young people can (and should) do is get vaccinated, no matter what their Covid infection history. You can't determine when you may or may not be infected with Covid, you CAN determine when you can be protected from its effects (and protect otgers), via vaccination. Shame on you.

  3. #23
    Not disgraceful and once again you misconstrue what is being said. I am not an anti backer but there is a lot of information out there in published studies which challenges and asks sensible questions.

    Today the UK official research into effectiveness was published which shows the vaccines are not as effective for as long as was hoped. I have had the vaccine as I have stated before but I would not be so arrogant as to force that decision on others especially the young for whom the considerations are a little different.

    You clearly are neither a scientist nor a medic as your logic and arguments seem to rely upon you always being right irrespective of the facts before you.

    I find your tone and comments often immature and highly offensive and as I have gently said to you many times before play the ball not the person.

    There was a phrase that comes to mind from when I was younger and lived in Leeds - Waddock.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,251
    Quote Originally Posted by WTF11 View Post
    Human beings are sociable animals, out genetics, physiology, psychology and behavioural characteristics over millenia show that to be fact. Some will be able to live with sealed borders, but only for a time (as has been shown), Queensland is one place, not sealed off and certainly not "secure", neither is anywhere else in Australia, nor (despite the holier than thou pronouncements of its premier), is New Zealand. Vaccination, vaccination, vaccination, to paraphrase Mr Hilton.
    And I have also stated in agreeance with you that vaccinations are the only real solution. My point is that unlike other States here, Qld has followed the rules better...and they have been able to minimise the impact. "IF" all other States did the same then there would be very few cases...and hence show that lockdowns and isolation can work well. True, it wont happen because of idiots!...but that doesnt rule out that it couldnt in the "perfect" world. Just saying...

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    3,701
    Quote Originally Posted by hopelesslyoptimistic View Post
    Not disgraceful and once again you misconstrue what is being said. I am not an anti backer but there is a lot of information out there in published studies which challenges and asks sensible questions.

    Today the UK official research into effectiveness was published which shows the vaccines are not as effective for as long as was hoped. I have had the vaccine as I have stated before but I would not be so arrogant as to force that decision on others especially the young for whom the considerations are a little different.
    I am curious and interested as to the reasons for your reticence at younger people getting vaccinated against Covid19. I cannot speak for policies in the UK, but here in the States, children are required to be vaccinated for diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, measles etc before they can attend school. Those are live attenuated virus inoculations which are almost definitely more "dangerous" than the mRNA vaccines. As for "time", the major reason why covid19 vaccines were so fast in development was because there were so many volunteer subjects due to the rapid spread of the virus. These vaccines have now been tested for over a year now (i am counting since clinical trials started) without significant major adverse effects. Of course I would be cautious in administering it to the young [under 12] and especially infants, as there has not been sufficient data, but when the trials are done and completed and if successful, I would think it relatively safe. So I am interested in your thoughts as I cannot think of too many reasons not to get vaccinated except as you have mentioned if you have already got and recovered from covid recently.
    Hope all on here are safe and well.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,931
    Quote Originally Posted by cherrypie7 View Post
    I am curious and interested as to the reasons for your reticence at younger people getting vaccinated against Covid19. I cannot speak for policies in the UK, but here in the States, children are required to be vaccinated for diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, measles etc before they can attend school. Those are live attenuated virus inoculations which are almost definitely more "dangerous" than the mRNA vaccines. As for "time", the major reason why covid19 vaccines were so fast in development was because there were so many volunteer subjects due to the rapid spread of the virus. These vaccines have now been tested for over a year now (i am counting since clinical trials started) without significant major adverse effects. Of course I would be cautious in administering it to the young [under 12] and especially infants, as there has not been sufficient data, but when the trials are done and completed and if successful, I would think it relatively safe. So I am interested in your thoughts as I cannot think of too many reasons not to get vaccinated except as you have mentioned if you have already got and recovered from covid recently.
    Hope all on here are safe and well.
    Hiya Cherry.

    For women thinking of having children,pregnant or breast feeding the info put about is based on limited research stats.
    I would worry about taking the current vaccines if pregnant,my Mum & Grandma also and that covers ages 34,56 & 86 advice wise from people who've been pregnant and myself who has not.

    As said in another thread I'm part of a long term medical research programme and will continue in it for many years for a reason.

    Like young footballers learning their trade - ability,motivation,lifestyle,understanding tactical knowledge,healthy eating & recovery are points that have to be learnt over time as a training young footballer.

    So I do understand reluctance for 'time' in a world that wants everything 'now' particularly in addressing what's the right approach to matters.

    In terms of stats playing PL football just 180 kids of the 1.5 million who play organised youth football at any one time will go onto a career in football.Thats just 0.012%.

    I'd like to know how many pregnant women are currently in the global vaccination research programmes and the results so far before considered choice.

    Just saying.

    https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets...cision-aid.pdf

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,307
    Quote Originally Posted by hopelesslyoptimistic View Post
    Not disgraceful and once again you misconstrue what is being said. I am not an anti backer but there is a lot of information out there in published studies which challenges and asks sensible questions.

    Today the UK official research into effectiveness was published which shows the vaccines are not as effective for as long as was hoped. I have had the vaccine as I have stated before but I would not be so arrogant as to force that decision on others especially the young for whom the considerations are a little different.

    You clearly are neither a scientist nor a medic as your logic and arguments seem to rely upon you always being right irrespective of the facts before you.

    I find your tone and comments often immature and highly offensive and as I have gently said to you many times before play the ball not the person.

    There was a phrase that comes to mind from when I was younger and lived in Leeds - Waddock.
    "A lot of information out there"..........perhaps that would bear greater scrutiny if you were able to quote/refer to peer-reviewed, publicly available studies by reputable and globally recognised professionals/scientists, whose work can be subject to rigorous review?

    Watch this, for an example of someone who isn't a scientist, but has grey matter between his ears, on the rapidly expanding Facebook "factsphere" that is allowing non-science to be presented as fact, supporting the likes of QAnon, racists, etc. It doesn't refer to Covid, as the speech was given before the pandemic, but it hits every nail on the head when it comes to calling out the trend towards acceptance of social media outlets as factual, simply because they exist on Facebook or Twitter, or whatever other sh1te people are being hoodwinked into believing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymaWq5yZIYM

    (It's the full speech, 24 minutes, but well worth watching)

    As to other parts of your post, you refer to the longevity of the antibodies generated via the vaccines. The programme was always going to be a subject for review (i.e. bit hard to establish a longevity of more than a year when the vaccines haven't been administered for that long), so the recent news that some antibodies last for less than a year is hardly a surprise and certainly ISN'T grounds for not getting vaccinated in the first place no matter what your age. Using antibody longevity to question the benefit of vaccination whilst ignoring all other benefits that the vaccines provide (e.g. protection against passing on the virus to others etc), is "selective" to say the least.

    None of the above are my opinions, but publicly available fact, so no, I DO NOT rely on always being right (about Leeds, yes, but not about Covid), I depend on the EVIDENCE that can and should be scrutinised, rather than vague assertions made that "there is lots of information available" without a shred of such evidence being presented as to the source, its review, those responsible for such review etc. There are ethics committees the world over who have worked tirelessly to make sure quality materials are available (I know, I have helped develop and implement the workflow technologies that help them work), perhaps you should make reference to some if you deign to respond?

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Monaco_Totty View Post
    Hiya Cherry.

    For women thinking of having children,pregnant or breast feeding the info put about is based on limited research stats.
    I would worry about taking the current vaccines if pregnant,my Mum & Grandma also and that covers ages 34,56 & 86 advice wise from people who've been pregnant and myself who has not.

    As said in another thread I'm part of a long term medical research programme and will continue in it for many years for a reason.

    Like young footballers learning their trade - ability,motivation,lifestyle,understanding tactical knowledge,healthy eating & recovery are points that have to be learnt over time as a training young footballer.

    So I do understand reluctance for 'time' in a world that wants everything 'now' particularly in addressing what's the right approach to matters.

    In terms of stats playing PL football just 180 kids of the 1.5 million who play organised youth football at any one time will go onto a career in football.Thats just 0.012%.

    I'd like to know how many pregnant women are currently in the global vaccination research programmes and the results so far before considered choice.

    Just saying.

    https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets...cision-aid.pdf
    As per my reply to HO in #27, there is real evidence=based information and advice
    out there, and not hard to find really;

    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2779182

    https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/news/2152-...pregnant-women

    https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guideline...and-pregnancy/

    https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/first-co...n-the-uk/27684

    Just a small sample from recognised, reputable organisations, no Facebook groups or Youtube videos!

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,931
    Quote Originally Posted by WTF11 View Post
    As per my reply to HO in #27, there is real evidence=based information and advice
    out there, and not hard to find really;

    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2779182

    https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/news/2152-...pregnant-women

    https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guideline...and-pregnancy/

    https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/first-co...n-the-uk/27684

    Just a small sample from recognised, reputable organisations, no Facebook groups or Youtube videos!

    Ta for that - still a bit iffy' those stats for those that have NOT had Covid 19 & have NOT had injections but want to start a family but some food for thought.

    Actually applied to English courts after my first Mental Health section to appeal against forced injections - still have recurring nightmares today of being held down by five nurses administering first one when I lost the appeal.Six months of daily injections left scars on my ass,one small lump now removed & gods know what still floating about in my body that wasn't absorbed into my bloodstream.

    So obviously I for one, like to know longer term study reports even though I've had both jabs.

    Appreciate your time tho.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6,202
    Don't disagree that fake news and propaganda are the rule of the day.

    However, the reality is that the vaccine does have side effects. That's not fake news. anyone that's around the healthcare profession has know of people that have had horrible reactions to the vaccine. it's more common amongst the people that have had Covid and the young. It's also not an "anamoly". when a percentage of people, in any group, have serious reactions that's a known risk. It also explains why 25% of the healthcare workers won't get vaccinated in the US. Almost all of them have had Covid and know a lot more about it that you and I do. It's not some conspiracy or kook theory. It's because they've seen what can happen. It should be up to the potential recipient whether they want to take that risk.

    The reality is that it's not optional. Governments are requiring it, Employers are requiring it and we are starting down the road of vaccine passports. Not far from the point of requiring a gold star on your clothing if you don't take the vaccine.

    if you think giving up freedoms and rights in order to be safe is what's happening here I think you've missed the big picture.

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •