Quote Originally Posted by jacobncfc View Post
I saw a Wealdstone fan describe our formation as 4-2-4, which was probably an accurate representation of how it actually turned out.
Wow, 4-2-4 very rarely gets a mention these days, but it provided me with some fantastic memories of our style under Jimmy Sirrel many years ago. It worked for us back then because we just needed a ball winner to give it to Masson, and he would do the rest. I can see why the Wealdstone fan saw it that way, because there were big spaces in the middle for both sides which you don't often see these days.