+ Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 70

Thread: Are we now worried ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,187
    Quote Originally Posted by Supersub6 View Post
    Football Supporters Association response:-



    FSA statement regarding yesterday’s Newcastle United takeover:

    The Premier League’s decision to approve the PIF takeover has reopened the debate about who owns our football clubs. While Newcastle United fans are understandably ecstatic to see the back of Mike Ashley, many supporters throughout the game, including some Newcastle fans, have expressed concerns about the role of nation states in the ownership structures of clubs and the impact of their human rights violations.

    Ultimately supporters have been put in an impossible position as billionaire owners pass clubs from one to another with no input from fans, meaning clubs at an elite level have become the playthings of individuals or regimes with shocking human rights records.

    Alan Shearer sums that up in The Athletic today saying ‘it seems to me that ethical issues have not played a huge part in Newcastle’s takeover. Or, to put that a different way, they have been part of the discussion, but not in the decision-making process. Should they be a fundamental strand of the owners’ and directors’ test? Perhaps they should, and perhaps the whole system of governance and ownership needs reform to reflect that. These are the rules that clubs have decided for themselves.’

    Football Supporters Europe (FSE) also raises important questions at a continental level, asking why the game as a whole has become so attractive to authoritarian regimes? And we too ask should moral judgements on overseas regimes be part of football’s Owners and Directors Test? Probably. Are those rules around moral relativism easy to draft? Definitely not. Is it possible to apply them retrospectively? We don’t know. But the FSA backs FSE’s demand of football’s governing bodies to work with supporters’ organisations in order to embed and enforce human rights protections within the game.

    We meet regularly with the Premier League and we will be questioning them, in great detail, about the exact nature of the ‘legally binding assurances’ they received before approving the takeover. We absolutely believe that any entity which owns a club in our league system should be UK-registered with total transparency in relation to overseas influences.

    The ongoing Fan-Led Review of Football Governance also provides an opportunity for the Government to look at the current Owners and Directors Test in relation to human rights. The review’s interim report was very good and its final report is due soon. We will discuss recent events, and the challenges they bring, with the Fan-Led Review panel as well as the Government, the football authorities and FSA members at our upcoming Annual General Meeting.
    Not sure what the best description of the above is, tripe or bullsh1t.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,721
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    Not sure what the best description of the above is, tripe or bullsh1t.
    This is the organisation that has been fighting for years to introduce 'safe standing' as was desired by many fans. They have also been campaigning for the introduction of a regulator who would independently scrutinise the whys and wherefores of takeovers such as this one. The biggest problem that they have is that the 'elite' clubs always want to put a spoke in the works and definitely rule the roost as far as what happens in the PL. The organisation deals with football throughout the Leagues in trying to give everyone a fair crack of the whip ---a thankless and probably hopeless task!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,187
    Quote Originally Posted by Supersub6 View Post
    This is the organisation that has been fighting for years to introduce 'safe standing' as was desired by many fans. They have also been campaigning for the introduction of a regulator who would independently scrutinise the whys and wherefores of takeovers such as this one. The biggest problem that they have is that the 'elite' clubs always want to put a spoke in the works and definitely rule the roost as far as what happens in the PL. The organisation deals with football throughout the Leagues in trying to give everyone a fair crack of the whip ---a thankless and probably hopeless task!
    Sub, I should make it clear, I was referring to the message, not the messenger, I just fall asleep reading that sort of stuff.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    Not sure what the best description of the above is, tripe or bullsh1t.
    Bottom line my mate is this...

    Attachment 20076

    Just our luck to have found an overseas buyer who is skint.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •