ot cctv

[Ericsladkilnhurst]

...and not forgetting that if anyone is capturing cctv images outside their boundary then a prominent sign needs to be displayed on their property for GDPR purposes for all to see
If there wasn't a sign it's likely that the images would not be admissible and the property owner could face prosecution under data protection laws

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough council ruling, a sign must be shown that cctv is being used at a property, which like mine
is a small sign in my window.
Lady 2 doors away from me, had a visit from the council to tell her a sign must be displayed, to say cctv is being used, even the
cctv unit in the door when anyone visits, which her family uses for her due to her being a blind person.
My sign in the window is 4" by 2".

[KerrAvon]

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough council ruling, a sign must be shown that cctv is being used at a property, which like mine
is a small sign in my window.
Lady 2 doors away from me, had a visit from the council to tell her a sign must be displayed, to say cctv is being used, even the
cctv unit in the door when anyone visits, which her family uses for her due to her being a blind person.
My sign in the window is 4" by 2".

The council are in no position to make such a ruling. They are entitled to advise people of the requirements of GDPR, but need to get it right, which they would not be if they suggest that CCTV that covers only the domestic property of the camera owner requires the giving of notice.

Here's the guidance from the man himself: https://ico.org.uk/your-data-matters...-being-filmed/