Quote Originally Posted by Ronners View Post
So flour, even allowing for the flaws of VAR, is it more consistent, to have people give decisions on the information it provides? whether we think they are right or wrong, do we only use VAR for offsides/ penalty decisions?/ ball in or out?, corner or goal kick? Or would you, like some on here, abolish VAR and go back to allowing the referee and linesmen to give decisions based on what they see? or do you or anyone else on here have any other way they would have decisions made?
I'm not having a go at you flour I might add, and I've only mentioned you because I've used your quote, but the question is open to all. UTM
No worries and I’m actually pro VAR Ronners because surely better information can only assist in a good way and clears up doubt.
My point is that there have been way too many contentious decisions that make the headlines and it’s usually as a result of someone’s interpretation of the facts or vagueness of the rules rather than the facts not being presented adequately.

To try and specifically answer your question though it would be my preference to persevere with VAR for game changing decisions only.
Not goal kicks or throw ins but did it cross the goal line etc
Was it offside but the rules have to be clear. If it’s a torso in front instead of a shin pads then make a sensible decision
Happy to provide another opinion if that doesn’t really answer it. Only my view though , others can disagree