Think he will get off on the technicality of her agreement tbh. Yes she was 17 but whilst legally of age in the UK the US. has different ages of consent for different states (bizarrely considering they were far slower than most to start raising this age for much of early 20 th century). Did she know what we was doing at the time? Yes-but she was almost undoubtedly groomed and therefore taken advantage of. Her later agreement smacks of money grabbing as surely she could have pursued Epstein and his cohorts to court if she was truly that upset and wanted them punished -but we do not know all the details. Epstein was exceptionally rich with very influential friends so may be she felt the case would not go her way? As for Randy Andy, well, you gotta love his excuses but many might say he shagged a 17 year old, so what? The point is that she was undoubtedly groomed and he was 4O at the time so 23 years older than her. Don't get me wrong, at 40 you might find some 17 year olds attractive-but most of us would have kids of our own not much younger than her at that age and would not even consider doing anything as this particular age difference would feel less like cradle snatching and more like ***** territory. It's not like she was 17 and he was 20 or whatever.
Whatever happens he's ****ed though and no sympathy for him at all. Probably the least liked inner family Royal and this is just another example of his entitled behaviour. Feel almost sorry for Her Maj. having to deal with him.