|
| + Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
it's the classic, double dealing trick....have the majority so feared up and wrapped up in this convid malarkey, imagining that they'll be safe from the reaper if they hit the needle....that they can't see the wood for the trees. I suppose it's nothing new - distraction is one of the crafts big players, they mostly always call on it when they need to sneak in a nasty - and usually to hit two birds with one stone - in plain sight and hazy like.....make folk believe they have great value to them - when in reality, they're being deceived - and this time - it's a destroyer, a leveller...the works been done, the ants have built the hill and fed the queen fat....it has everything it needs in spades, including that which can lessen the value of the workers/people...turning them into little more than a counterproductive pest....you could say, we built our own end, and handed them the keys to achieve its goal.
![]()
.
makes no sense - BT....how did you respond ?
--
Sajid Javid directly challenged on mandatory coronavirus jabs by unvaccinated NHS doctor
During a visit to King's College Hospital in south London, Mr Javid asked staff members on the intensive care unit about their thoughts on new rules requiring vaccination for NHS workers.
And Steve James, a consultant anaesthetist who has been treating coronavirus patients since the start of the pandemic, told the health secretary about his displeasure.
"I'm not happy about that," he said. "I had COVID at some point, I've got antibodies, and I've been working on COVID ICU since the beginning.
"I have not had a vaccination, I do not want to have a vaccination. The vaccines are reducing transmission only for about eight weeks for Delta, with Omicron it's probably less.
The consultant suggested the health secretary could use the "changing picture" of the COVID pandemic during the Omicron wave to "reconsider" the rule.
Alternatively, Mr James suggested, the government could "nuance" the rules to allow those who have antibodies - but acquired from infection and not vaccination - to not be required to have a jab.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...octor-12511224
![]()
From Norder: "makes no sense - BT....how did you respond ?"
I told them he was double jabbed in accordance with his GP's wishes but he not had the booster.
I said the jabs must be pointless because during his 15 week incarceration he had tested positive on 3 separate occasions.
The response was, "obviously the jabs work, otherwise he would probably be dead."
We then got another call to say the cause of his 2nd & 3rd hospital contracted Covid virus was probably because he missed his booster.
Hope that clarifies the situation my mate?![]()
Latest stats show the booster still protecting against serious illness and death, but the initial protection against infection and transmission has collapsed already. Just more evidence that attempting to prevent, or even slow, the spread of Omicron by the use of boosters and vaccine passports is utterly futile. Evidence which will continue to be ignored of course.
Worry not folks, Novak and his lawyers are saying that he has had Covid in December, therefore, that makes him immune to Australian Laws ----the mind boggles.
Going off this philosophy, it would appear that, if you have already had the virus, you can't get it again and you are immune to everything relating to the virus. BT, perhaps you could use this 'Novak Argument' to have your father-in-law realeased from hospital because ---according to Novak and his lawyers ---he could not possibly have caught the virus three times --no matter what ---once is enough!
That's what they say Sub, however Sir Keir Starmer has caught it twice and is enduring his SIXTH spell in isolation. I don't believe a word any of them say any more. I'm still waiting for someone to tell us what is blindingly obvious from the stats, it's over, Omicron peaked at the back end of December and has been in decline ever since.
as nutty as expected....BT - perhaps nuttier, but doubt they even realise what they're saying - they just say what they're programmed to say...as if we're as droid as them !
A good friend visited the docs before christmas, saw the nurse for some routine check-up - talk turned convid and friend ended up correcting Nurse - she didn't like it, actually started rubbishing facts (Trial Vaccine etc)....seems they make it up as they go along - it's Sad.
that be aquired Immunity....Sub ?...seems to be a forgotten thing since Convid, it meant your body/cells had responded to a previous viral attack, fought it, and remembered it....so if it came along again (even a small part / regularly weaker varient of it) - then your body/cells would recognise it and be ready to respond with its Long Term T Cells.....but were supposed to forget about that, like it never happened....much like we were supposed to forget about herd immunity....where are we, 2 yrs later ?
Dr Andrew Freedman, Reader in Infectious Diseases and Honorary Consultant Physician, Cardiff University School of Medicine, said:
“This is an important study which may help to explain why some people who were repeatedly exposed to COVID-19 before the vaccine rollout apparently did not catch it.
It appears that some of them had pre-existing memory T cell immunity to a protein involved in replication of the virus, probably induced by previous infection with other seasonal coronaviruses. This, the authors suggest, may have resulted in a transient, abortive infection after exposure to SARS-CoV-2. The immune system was able to clear the virus rapidly before it could cause symptoms or be detected either by PCR or antibody production.
https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/e...to-sars-cov-2/
![]()