Sturgeonland

[donsdaft]

I’ll chip in with the definition of a woman.

noun
an adult female human being. A person that most of the Aberdeen Mad right wing are either divorced from, or never went within 10 feet of legally

Yay
I get to agree with Mason.

What a woman is definitely not, is a bloke dressed up.

[InversneckieDob]

You are being obtuse and well you know it.

What a sad effort from you that was, you knew fine well what was meant.

I will leave it at that.

I genuinely don't know "what was meant".
I try not to involve myself in this type of stuff.

So, once more, can you give me an example of what "defining a woman" means?

And what would entail a private citizen "being cancelled"?

If you feel I'm being obtuse, that's your call.
Maybe I am, but certainly not intentionally.

I truthfully do not understand what those expressions mean.

[InversneckieDob]

Mason the supporter of women rights by thinking that a bloke can be one. Bangs on about science then completely ignores it when it doesn’t suit him.

So the "defining a woman" expression relates to transgender rights (or denial thereof)?
Is that right?

[57vintage]

So the "defining a woman" expression relates to transgender rights (or denial thereof)?
Is that right?

I would assume so, given that that’s the cause of more shouting matches herein than David Bates’s ball control.

I too keep out of it, am pretty comfortable with the subject, and as I told a young relative at New Year, there’s a bill on its way which seems to have the legs to be passed, and since this isn’t something that can be bench-tested in situ, let’s see how it works once enacted.

Other than that, I don’t really give a ****.

[donsdaft]

.....and while we're at it, let's legislate that the earth is flat and that we all have the right to play for Aberdeen.

[InversneckieDob]

.....and while we're at it, let's legislate that the earth is flat and that we all have the right to play for Aberdeen.

Well, the earth isn't flat so I don't think legislation would change that.

And we all have the right to endeavour to play for Aberdeen, like we have the right to endeavour to be Prime Minister or to cop off with Beyonce.

So I don't think legislation is necessary.

[donsdaft]

Well, the earth isn't flat so I don't think legislation would change that.



So I don't think legislation is necessary.

...and a man can't become a woman, no matter how much he wants to.

[InversneckieDob]

...and a man can't become a woman, no matter how much he wants to.

Well, with surgery they can?
Why does this bother people so much?
I genuinely don't get why, in a world with so much visible and overt cu nt-age on display and being implemented by people in power, thus subject is worth one scintilla of anger.

[donsdaft]

I’m not angry*
They can’t, it’s a simple fact.
No amount of propaganda gets around it.
A bloke with his c’ock cut off is a bloke with his c’ock cut off.

He’s not a woman


* I admit that the constant propaganda annoys me.

[InversneckieDob]

I would assume so, given that that’s the cause of more shouting matches herein than David Bates’s ball control.

I too keep out of it, am pretty comfortable with the subject, and as I told a young relative at New Year, there’s a bill on its way which seems to have the legs to be passed, and since this isn’t something that can be bench-tested in situ, let’s see how it works once enacted.

Other than that, I don’t really give a ****.

I'm pretty much comfortable with anything that goes on between consenting adults, in terms of stroop-age or anything else.

If an individual feels that they are the wrong gender and wants to transition to a different gender, and they've undergone their requisite psychological evaluation, counselling, whatever, knock yourself out.

In the fu cked up world in which we are all currently residing, it strikes me there's so much more worthy of our collective ire than these relatively minor things.

Or a meringue?