O/T:- ⚠️Impressed with the leadership [The UK Party Politics Thread]

[BigFatPie]

I shall answer both questions in a statement that I believe to be true:

Of course Andrew had xes with that girl - there were even messages sent by her to her friends saying that she went to bed with him. The photo is genuine, that cannot be denied but just think about it, at the time he had xes with her, he was a fairly young single guy (separated or divorced) - he met a very attractive young girl who to be fair looked a lot older than 17 so he probably didn’t give a thought about her being under age so, without any doubt I as far as I believe he did have xes with her.

What he did was no more than most of the men on this board would have done (if they are honest - did they check the girls birth certificate) the biggest mistake he made was following the instructions of the lawyers who advised him “you never even met this girl - deny it at all cost”. Had he have come clean and told the truth (despite his so-called legal advice) and said “yes, I did have xes with her, it never even occurred to me she was under age (only in that US state or perhaps a few others?)

Had he have ignored the stupid advice from his lawyers, he would have been able to use the ‘evidence’ of her friend receiving messages saying ‘I got prince Andrew into bed’. Had this have been the case, most people would just have called him ‘Randy Andy” and that would have been the end of the matter. In the end he had to pay the £9m to make the episode go away as it was taking centre stage over the Queens Jubilee year.

Regards Her Majesty having Andrew as her escort, why shouldn’t she, he was her son, Prince Philip was his dad and she probably knows the truth and also about the bad advice.

Thats my take on it. “Long live the Queen and the Monarchy”

Jesus, what a pile of sh!t. Blame the advisers, the same old tune from Tories and the royals and the arselickers who support them. What sort of thick tw@t claims they’ve not met someone when there’s a photo doing the rounds with their arm literally around that person?

As for Sunak, these ridiculous claims that his missus’s finance have nothing to do with him? Try that argument to claim any means tested benefits when your partner(not even your wife) earns over a certain amount. (Edit sorry Ochpie, just saw you’ve said the same thing)

Honestly, the right wing lads on here need to do better, the bollox they talk is getting too easy to point out, it’s getting boring. Up the Republic.

[BanjoPie]

Jesus, what a pile of sh!t. Blame the advisers, the same old tune from Tories and the royals and the arselickers who support them. What sort of thick tw@t claims they’ve not met someone when there’s a photo doing the rounds with their arm literally around that person?

As for Sunak, these ridiculous claims that his missus’s finance have nothing to do with him? Try that argument to claim any means tested benefits when your partner(not even your wife) earns over a certain amount. (Edit sorry Ochpie, just saw you’ve said the same thing)

Honestly, the right wing lads on here need to do better, the bollox they talk is getting too easy to point out, it’s getting boring. Up the Republic.

“Up yours”

[sidders]

“Up yours”

A subtle argument to which there is no comeback.

[ancientpie]

A subtle argument to which there is no comeback.

Seems a typical reply on political threads but without the BS.

[Elite_Pie]

Seems a typical reply on political threads but without the BS.

Maybe, but the thing that concerns me is that we have a Prime Minister who has openly lied to the people who voted him in, and not many of them seem to care. Apathy can be just as dangerous as extremism, but as a nation apathy seems to be the popular choice.

[BigFatPie]

A subtle argument to which there is no comeback.

To be fair to Banjo, it was more worthwhile than his previous contribution to the thread.

[BanjoPie]

To be fair to Banjo, it was more worthwhile than his previous contribution to the thread.

Now, now BFP, who started this thread?