Originally Posted by
SBRed48
A still can't get mi eeard rarnd this separation of the owners and Board. The Board, as Kane states are responsible for the day to day running of the club whereas the owners set the general vision and policies of the club. If the owners want one direction developing but the Board implement another direction who has the final say ?
The situation of Lee owning 31% of the club, Conway and Hung 8% means the balance of power rests with these unknown "Investors" owning 20%. We are told nothing about the approach/ views of Quay and her husband and the three other mystery investors she represents who comprise the "Investors Group", previously represented by Conway.
It could be a volatile situation and more information is required about this "Investors Group".