Quote Originally Posted by EthelRed View Post
My view is that appointing Warnock would show real intent for next season. Tried, tested and generally successful.

The appointment of a manager with a patchy record or another who is relatively novicey would be a gamble not unlike the gambles taken before. I think the positive comments about other these candidates is based on the fact they are familiar with the English leagues and are British or have enjoyed a career in Britain.

The dilemma for our owners is that they gamble on all employees eventually making them a profit in the sell on market. Warnock wouldnt generate that value whereas the others might if successful.

However our new chairman has said results on the field are priority therefore the prudent appointment would be Warnock because of his history in the game.

Just my thoughts on this.
Be nice wouldn't it Eths and certainly not beyond the realms of possibility