Quote Originally Posted by BCram View Post
I think the Open Letter helped the situation. Saying nothing would not help those who have to make decisions about our club. IMO the sort of opinions expressed by the Open Letter writers would be either a surprise or a confirmation of what a section of the support were thinking. Either way it should have helped the people who have responsibility for making choices about the direction our club should take.
If you get an open response to an open letter then that should be a sign that open talks are the way forward.
Completely agree about Dayster's comment about not getting a response to correspondence. It's maybe very old school but I think an acknowledgement and an explanation that the comments were noted should be the minimum acceptable response. Maybe communications can't be kept private any more and so public comment is the only way forward.
Our club as gone to the dogs since Nelms took the reins.I think the open letter was absolutely the right thing to having been 'rubbered'. God help us when he eventually selects a manager. Another disastrous fiasco, I fear.