I get the demand for a cost of living rise but I just can't get how the RMT can demand no redundancies and resist some basic sensible reforms of working practices. Just a couple of examples.

A worker can refuse to share a van. Therefore as many vans as workers can turn up for a job.

A whole crew has to attend a job even if the job doesn't warrant that many workers.

The rail companies stance that cost savings from these outdated (did they ever make sense) could be used to increase pay makes every sense to me. Anyone differ?