+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 231 of 489 FirstFirst ... 131181221229230231232233241281331 ... LastLast
Results 2,301 to 2,310 of 4887

Thread: O/T:- ⚠️Impressed with the leadership [The UK Party Politics Thread]

  1. #2301
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,976
    Quote Originally Posted by GranthamPie View Post
    Hated?… nah… only by the establishment, never ordinary people. A man of principle, honesty and integrity… values sadly lacking in the current Labour regime. I went to many of the rally’s where he spoke… thousands upon thousands turned up to listen to him speak.

    Remember Glastonbury?

    https://youtu.be/w2uW5YsJkOE
    Corbyn only spoke to people who already agreed with him. He had no interest or ability to persuade the 10-15 % of people who switch parties and are the key to winning an election. And yes the working class people who I worked/mixed/socialised with did hate him, and if they didn’t hate him, they never thought he was a credible choice as PM. Hence why we have a right wing troglodyte as an MP in Lincoln rather than the still working nurse we had until 2019. And all that’s before we mention anti semitism and pals like Chris Williamson who should never have been anywhere near the Labour Party let alone be an MP.

    I fully get why anyone might think Starmer isn’t the most inspiring character as Labour leader. The old saying about not letting perfect be the enemy of good very much holds though, and I want the Labour Party in power where they invariably improve people’s lives more than the self serving cretins who’ve we had for the last 12 years.

  2. #2302
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    8,997
    Quote Originally Posted by Elite_Pie View Post
    That's about where I'm at. I've never been a big fan of PR before because it all seemed a bit wishy-washy, but after the way this bunch have scandalously and callously abused a big majority I see it as the best way forward, in the short term at least.

    As things stand, I can't support any party with conviction, so my vote will again go to the candidate most likely to keep the Tory out.
    You're either in favour of proportional representation or in favour of disproportional representation, there is no other category for that one.

    Apart from being obviously fairer, it's the key to smashing our sterile and corrupt two-party system. Their combined vote would probably shrivel from 75% to 35% within a decade. That's why they'll resist it, but while they do they're denying democracy. The UK is just too diverse and complicated in 2022 to be stuffed into 2 archaic out-of-touch parties.

    I was excited to see Andy Burnham come out in favour of PR. If he led Labour I could certainly vote for him, always someone aware of how timid his party has become and not afraid to break out of the groupthink and speak out.

  3. #2303
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,976
    Quote Originally Posted by the_anticlough View Post
    You're either in favour of proportional representation or in favour of disproportional representation, there is no other category for that one.

    Apart from being obviously fairer, it's the key to smashing our sterile and corrupt two-party system. Their combined vote would probably shrivel from 75% to 35% within a decade. That's why they'll resist it, but while they do they're denying democracy. The UK is just too diverse and complicated in 2022 to be stuffed into 2 archaic out-of-touch parties.

    I was excited to see Andy Burnham come out in favour of PR. If he led Labour I could certainly vote for him, always someone aware of how timid his party has become and not afraid to break out of the groupthink and speak out.
    If you’re so keen on getting PR in, refusing to vote Labour seems a strange way of going about it.

  4. #2304
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    12,225
    Quote Originally Posted by GranthamPie View Post
    As opposed to Patel and Mogg?

    Yup.. you’ve sold it to me
    Good point. Well it would be if JRM is chancellor!

  5. #2305
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    8,997
    Quote Originally Posted by BigFatPie View Post
    If you’re so keen on getting PR in, refusing to vote Labour seems a strange way of going about it.
    Let me get this straight...if you want PR you should vote for a party that opposes it...?!

    Tories and Labour will resist it for as long as they can (that's their own selfish interest)...

    Hung parliaments would force a rethink. FPTP outcomes will likely become too embarrassing and so glaringly unfair to hold up to scrutiny.
    The Greens could get 20% and 0 seats (I'll vote Green) - more actual votes than the SNP, who would get 50+ seats. The old parties would mop up the rest of the 500-600 seats on not much more than the Greens got. (This already happened to The Brexit Party but nobody cared about that, they were always going to deliver their voters straight to the tories).

    People need to stop voting for Tories and Labour (while they remain so conservative and opposed to a fair voting system). Only then will this rotten political system of ours collapse and be replaced by something better - more representative, fairer, and open to different voices that will always be drowned out or never heard under FPTP.

  6. #2306
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    8,997
    Quote Originally Posted by BigFatPie View Post
    If you’re so keen on getting PR in, refusing to vote Labour seems a strange way of going about it.
    Just this minute read this (last but 1 paragraph most important).

    https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...tury-democracy

    And then this

    https://labourlist.org/2021/07/exclu...epresentation/

  7. #2307
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    634
    Quote Originally Posted by the_anticlough View Post
    People need to stop voting for Tories and Labour (while they remain so conservative and opposed to a fair voting system). Only then will this rotten political system of ours collapse and be replaced by something better - more representative, fairer, and open to different voices that will always be drowned out or never heard under FPTP.
    We have had progress over centuries to lessen the power of one person (the monarch) and every now and then to increase the number and variety of people who can exercise some power - barons (magna carta), parliament (the civil war), men in general (getting rid of rotten boroughs), women (suffragette movement), younger people (reductions in minimum voting age).

    It’s high time we extended a bit further, and made each vote equal (proportional representation) instead of giving swing voters in marginals all the power to decide which of Labour and Conservatives gets to be dictator for the next five years. We’ve never actually given democracy a try.

    My vote has never made any difference to who forms the Government - I’ve always lived in a safe seat (Lib Dem or Labour). Has yours?

  8. #2308
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,976
    Quote Originally Posted by the_anticlough View Post
    Let me get this straight...if you want PR you should vote for a party that opposes it...?!

    Tories and Labour will resist it for as long as they can (that's their own selfish interest)...

    Hung parliaments would force a rethink. FPTP outcomes will likely become too embarrassing and so glaringly unfair to hold up to scrutiny.
    The Greens could get 20% and 0 seats (I'll vote Green) - more actual votes than the SNP, who would get 50+ seats. The old parties would mop up the rest of the 500-600 seats on not much more than the Greens got. (This already happened to The Brexit Party but nobody cared about that, they were always going to deliver their voters straight to the tories).

    People need to stop voting for Tories and Labour (while they remain so conservative and opposed to a fair voting system). Only then will this rotten political system of ours collapse and be replaced by something better - more representative, fairer, and open to different voices that will always be drowned out or never heard under FPTP.
    Of course Labour are saying they don’t want PR, as a potential party of government they still have to pretend they can win a majority under FPTP. The chances of that though are minimal, as it stands with the colossal defeat in 2019 the best as progressives we can probably hope for is Labour as the biggest party. PR or some other form of electoral reform will naturally flow from that result.

    Hoping people will stop voting for Tories or Labour and thinking some other nirvana will establish itself is pie in the sky imo. You have to deal with life as it is rather than how you wish it to be. There’s a reason why the English have never had a proper revolution.

  9. #2309
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    8,997
    Quote Originally Posted by BigFatPie View Post
    PR or some other form of electoral reform will naturally flow from that result.
    I don't think so, the PLP will fight it tooth and nail (but the fact that the grass roots wants it so strongly will make it hard for them to resist)



    It's you that brought 'nirvana' into it...a really poor characterisation of what I'm saying. Seeing the end of our dreadful electoral system is key to giving the country a chance to change - I don't think we can survive any more cycles of tories, red tories, tories...

  10. #2310
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    8,997
    Quote Originally Posted by applepie2 View Post

    It’s high time we extended a bit further, and made each vote equal (proportional representation) instead of giving swing voters in marginals all the power to decide which of Labour and Conservatives gets to be dictator for the next five years. We’ve never actually given democracy a try.

    My vote has never made any difference to who forms the Government - I’ve always lived in a safe seat (Lib Dem or Labour). Has yours?
    No, never.

    And one thing we can dismiss is the claim that we can't break the link between voters and their constituency MP. What bollox.

    Take the recent example - Pincher, the Tory whip ***ually assaulted men in bars after a long track record of doing the same. Apparently, he didn't respond to people anyway. But now he's gone AWOL, 'getting help' but is currently unavailable to his constituents and will be for an indefinite period. That's what they usually do when what they've done is so embarrassing they can't face people, but so much of that constituent-MP bond, don't you think?

Page 231 of 489 FirstFirst ... 131181221229230231232233241281331 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •