Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.
Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!
Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.
Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you
The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.
So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!
(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)
Originally Posted by BCram
Agree that our social services seem to be aimed at keeping people in the system rather than getting them back on their feet and looking after themselves. Had a very well informed talk at our Rotary Club by someone who had to deal with drug addiction. I was surprised y his support for the methadone support for addicts. Apparently the problem is not the methadone but the lack of rigorous care packages to help addicts to get out of the system. Nobody thinks that allowing addicts to live on a methadone programme is acceptable but the cost to the state/society of doing nothing and withdrawing methadone is greater than the cost of the methadone programme. Actually putting in a programme of rehabilitation will be an expensive additional cost.
Reply With Quote