o/t the Convent

[deek5trans]

So what you are saying is that it’s the police’s fault that the convent has went on fire? And yet unless I have missed something, there has been nothing to say that the fire has been set deliberately.

It’s all to easy to blame the police. You live in one of the safest places in the.world and a lot of that is down to the police. Are they correct in everything they do. Far from it. But they get most things right and to say it’s embarrassing that it’s happened a mile away from there hq in the middle of the night reflects on your attitude deek. That’s like saying everyone who lives next door to the convent should be embarrassed since it’s on their door step.

Every article including from the person who owns it mentions ongoing vandalism issues including days after the fire! so although maybe not confirmed in the media yet, it's probably a safe bet it was a deliberate act

[fatfan]

Every article including from the person who owns it mentions ongoing vandalism issues including days after the fire! so although maybe not confirmed in the media yet, it's probably a safe bet it was a deliberate act

So mr hewitson has complained about vandalism at the convent. Can you tell me what mr hewitson has done about this? Has he invested in any form of security for the building. Has he employed a security company to patrol the area? Has he put cameras up to deter people from congregating there. Has he put up a secure fence around the building to deter people from entering. Absolutely nothing was done but yet you expect the police to do all this on top of everything else. If you left your car wide open in an area where there was a high crime rate, is it the fault of the police if you get items stolen from your car? Sorry deek but you are talking absolute *******s here and have managed to bring a political debate onto a foot ball thread. Sad thing is you’ve got a bite out of me so I really don’t know who is the bigger bell end here, you for your comments or me for taking the bait