Quote Originally Posted by SBRed48 View Post
It's not rocket science Nudge.

The percentage of shares owned is already known from the last legal registration on the Hong Kong Registry.
The shares offered in the first batch totalled £1 million
It was reported on the Registry they were bought in proportion to the percentage already owned. Existing shareholders have first rights to buy up to their existing percentage. They all did.

So, for example, The Investor Group own 20% so what they paid was 20% of £1million which equals £200,000

To purchase their share of the second batch they would need to pay 20% of £3.2 million which is £640,000

And so on. Simply multiply the percentage of shares owned by the amount in money of the value of the shares being offered for sale.

I did not have to "dig deep", Year 6's could do it with a calculator.
Yes I understand how you have come to those figures.
So taking onboard what Neerav has said at both of the last two Supporters Trusts meetings ie ‘those directors that didn’t invest, their stake in the club has reduced’.
So I would imagine he was referring to Lee / Conway there.
I don’t know how this works - but Neerav has said this on two separate occasions now.

In other words - as you have shown - there is a way of calculating the individual investment with relation to the percentage of shares held.
But that may not have occurred in practice.
And we have been told that it hasn’t - so where does that sit with the shift in stakeholders within the club?

It would be great to hear that Chien Lee is still interested in the club and is willing to invest his own money.
But reading between the lines that doesn't seem to be the case.